Is Barack Hussein Obama telling Israel to kiss his foot?

June 10, 2009 at 9:37 pm (Israel, Obama) (, )

Some Israelis Insulted By Obama Picture

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/06/09/world/worldwatch/entry5076128.shtml

RedeemedHippie>>>[It is my belief, nothing that this man does is without purpose and intention.]

Israeli TV newscasters Tuesday night interpreted a photo taken Monday in the Oval Office of President Obama talking on the phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an “insult” to Israel.

They saw the incident as somewhat akin to an incident last year, when the Iraqi reporter threw a shoe at President Bush in Baghdad.

It is considered an insult in the Arab world to show the sole of your shoe to someone. It is not a Jewish custom necessarily, but Israel feels enough a part of the Middle East after 60 years to be insulted too.

Was there a subliminal message intended from the White House to Netanyahu in Jerusalem, who is publicly resisting attempts by Mr. Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to force Israel to stop any kind of settlement activity in occupied territories once and forever?

Whether or not it is true, it shows the mood in Israel. They feel cornered. The reactions out of Israel reflect that feeling.

Netanyahu is making a speech Sunday, in part as a response to Mr. Obama’s address to the Arab world last week in Cairo.

Israel’s Channel One TV reported that Netanyahu was told Tuesday by an “American official” in Jerusalem that, “We are going to change the world. Please, don’t interfere.” The report said Netanyahu’s aides interpreted this as a “threat.”

Netanyahu met with George Mitchell today for four hours in Jerusalem. The State Department announced this afternoon that Mitchell will be stopping in Beirut and Damascus when he finishes his visits to Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Was this cop wrong?

June 10, 2009 at 4:17 pm (Can Ya Dig It? Justice Sweet Justice) ()

I get angry when I see unjust police brutality. In this case below, a 72 year old woman was tazered by an officer when she refused to complie with a simple signing of a speeding ticket. 

I can not really fault the officer in this case.

It doesn’t matter that she was 72 years old. Just because someone is 72 does not mean they can not be mean as a snake. How did he know that as rebellious as she was, she did not have a weapon? It looked to me she either knowingly or unknowingly was risking his life by  refusing to stand back, forcing him to be on the expressway.

First, the woman was speeding.

Second, she was expected to sign a ticket. She refused. 

Third, she had him almost out in the expressway. He moved her, not shoved her. She began to challenge him by walking towards him.

She did not complie at all.

She rebelled and was going back to her car.

He stopped her.

She continued to be a pain in the butt.

She even dared him!

He tazered her.

Cop was right. She was wrong.

I hope the cop wins.

End of story.

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/09/good-news-cop-tasers-72-year-old-great-grandmother/

Permalink Leave a Comment

Voted for Obama? Let me ask you…

June 3, 2009 at 8:59 pm (Let it be Known!, Obama, Socialism; Something that Pukes Me, Truth Speakers) (, , , )

For those of you who voted for Obama and want Socialism, let me ask what part of socialism do you like?
The part where the hard working middle class people have to pay for the bums all across the land?

The part where the rich are taxed so badly that they can no longer create jobs for the rest of us?

The part where healthcare is taken over by government and then we will have no choice in doctors and have to wait an eternity just to see one? Or how about the fact that this new administration from hell has said that the elderly will be on the bottom of the list for health care. Why? Because the senior citizens have lived their lives. Just as they have no regard for the unborn, they will have no regard for you should you live to be a ripe old age. Unless, you are some use to them and their agenda.

Maybe you like the part where “hate” crime means the life of a homosexual is more important than the life of my heterosexual brother or my elderly mother just because someone is homo?

Do you like the part where babies can be murdered in the womb just because it is so convenient? Not to say at tax payers expense. Or maybe you like where the American tax payer will foot the bill for abortions all across the world. God will not put up with this kind of murdering of innocents much longer! He sets before us life and death–choose life!

Do you uphold and like the belief that all religions are fine, except for Christianity? Let me say now; Jesus is the only way to heaven. If you don’t like that, too bad. I will not apologize for the truth and I will not sugar-coat it for the sake of a fake peace just to get along with you.

Do you like the part where hard working every day people have to work their butts off to put their child through college while someone else’s no-count kid gets to have baby after baby at tax payer expense and go to college for free? While one young person is working his/her butt off, the other one gets to sit on his/her butt and collect all kinds of stuff from the state. I guess that is “fair” though cause she is a “single” mother. I know this sounds crude, never the less it is true; she put herself in that position every time she opened her legs and let the different “daddies” stick it to her. So YOU tell me, why should the one who did it wrong be rewarded for her bad choices.

And that no–count punk young man who has fathered child after child and not expected to pay child support. Do you like paying for his kids with your taxes?

Or maybe you like the part where this pig government is going to force every company in this nation to have health care for their employees. Whether they can afford it or not. Buy your own health care is what I say. People always spend their money on what they want to spend it on. Booze, cigs, pot, dope, fancy cars, fancy homes, electronics, cell phones, computers, etc. Then they expect someone else to come along and pay off their doctor bills. What a crock!

Or maybe you like the part where government wants to enforce THEIR very own sense of morality on the rest of us. Telling me I HAVE to accept certain things or else it is “hate.” On the same hand they can say anything and everything about my faith. But I had better not disagree or else I am the one accused of hate. Hypocrites! And you dare not stand for truth?!

Right now in the past week, two people were murdered in cold blood; one an abortionist baby killer and the other a soldier of the United States murdered by a Muslim. Are you willing to speak out for both murders being just as wrong as the next? Or are you making one (Tiller, the baby killer) a martyr? If so, then you are a hypocrite and you can not see the difference between one life being evil and the other noble for defending your right to believe what ever lies you want to believe.

Do you like the part where government takes over businesses and people end up losing their jobs, all in the name of sacrifice? While YOUR president flits all around the nation to plays and restaurants, like some kind of king–at tax payers expense.

Or maybe you like the part where we right wingers are now called terrorists because we believe in God, hate communism, against abortion and gay marriage. Oh and yep, we cling to our guns and religion. If you particularly like this one, then we definitely have nothing in common because you are a true coward and have made yourself an enemy of what is supposed to be the freest nation on earth by not even having the guts to stand up for what the truth is and against the true terrorists in this nation.

Maybe you like the bill they want to pass to keep everyday people from having their own little private garden? Where it would be a “crime” to pass a neighbor a tomato over the fence unless government has come in and had rights to it first. Oh, and let us not forget all the regulations–we must be good citizens and do it just like government says. This kind of government can stick it where the sun don’t shine!

What about the part that wants illegal aliens in this country just so they can be used to build their voting block while YOU and I pay for all their FREE benefits?

Maybe you like government owning businesses? People losing their jobs. Oh how pig man Obama loves to create a crisis. It just makes things better for him to take control. When it happens, people will be BEGGING government to fix things. And then they will do ANYTHING to continue getting that welfare check. Even spy on their neighbor or report them to the civilian force that this pig wants to set up. Will you be one of them? Would you be willing to turn me in for disagreeing with this government just so you would could get government goodies? Do not think it can’t happen. It most certainly will.

Or the hate speech crime that would shut people up like me because we disagree with his majesty, Obama, the socialist pig, maybe you like that one? Guess what? I will NOT shut up. He is a pig and all those who think I owe them something because of the poor mistakes they made in life, because of the color of their skin, because of their disgusting sexual aberration, because they are here illegally, whatever…are pigs too. I don’t give a royal rip who it is.

Do you like the part where liars call good evil and evil good? Do not think God will not be your judge as well as those who set up ungodly laws and standards.

How about teaching little kids sex education (homosexuality) without parent’s permission? Do you like that one? If so, then you are as perverse as those who desire to strip the rights away from parents, indoctrinating children all across this great land.

Maybe you like the idea that socialism promises everyone to be equal. To that I would say what gives you or Obama the right to force me or your neighbor to work harder than the next just so they can have their frikkin dream house that they can not afford?!

Maybe you think we all can just sit in a universal circle and sing Kumbya or Give Peace a Chance and well, we all will just get along. Wrong.

Do you like the part where Obama is going all around the world apologizing for us? What do you think it will accomplish other than making us look weak and have our enemies laughing at us? Your leader is a sissy! Be honest–if someone was breaking into your home and threatening you and your family, who would you rather have protecting you–Obama or any limp-wristed liberal man, or John Wayne? You know which one you would choose. So don’t be a hypocrite!

Do you like the part where Obama and his people desire to see YOU serve (become indoctrinated) whether you want to or not?

For the record, I will NOT serve, so what about that? Are you going to be one of the ones that may come knocking on my door to recruit me? What will you do when I tell you to shove it? Report me, so you can continue to get goodies form your pig government?

Are you expecting to get some “freebies?” NOTHING is free. You WILL pay a price.

Do you like the part where Obama is being hailed as some great world leader? Just remember when he bows before any man on this earth, he will expect the same from you.

As for me, I bow before no man.

What part of the stimulus package to you expect to get? Do you think it will come without a price?

Do you like the part that wants to give homosexuals some kind of special rights just because of their sexual preference? If so, you are as vile as they are in their aberrations. Do not think a Holy God will not judge a nation for it’s sexual sins. He most certainly will.

Maybe you like the part where it is called art, and the right of perverts in San Fransico to parade nude in painted bodies before the whole city; including in front of small children.

Or maybe you just like your “leader” to be one who has promised to take care of you? Oh at the tax payers’ expense I might add. Let me say here, if you truly believe that man (who is a type of anti-christ) cares for you, you are very mistaken. He would as soon get rid of you when he is done using you as anyone else. He will use you and abuse you and you will not even know it because he and his minions will have already indoctrinated you so well, that you will believe government is the answer to all the problems in the world. You will pay a price one day. You will pay a dear price.

The day is approaching of a one world currency, one world religion, one world everything. The stage is being set right now. People like me will be looked upon as “enemies of the state.” Know now, I will NOT be part of that world. I warn you now. You make God in heaven your enemy if you make this or any other government your god!

 

 

Permalink Leave a Comment

Attention, General Motor Voters

June 2, 2009 at 5:08 pm (Obama's Dream; Our Nightmare, Socialism; Something that Pukes Me) (, )

Attention General Motor voters

Note: This article is not for the ones who did not vote for Obama.

Did you vote for him? You know the one. Obama. Did you campaign for him and pass out buttons for him? Wave his banners of “hope.” Did you listen to Oprah and all the other Hollywood elitists as if they knew what the hell they were talking about? Did you cry along with those who made him some kind of messiah, believing he was going to be your savior? Did you chant the mantra, “change” with others who fell into a sea of deception? Did you think he was going to do miracles in your life? Did you make a vow to serve him?

Now what? You along with about 20,000 more hard working people are going to lose your job. Why? Because your president, the one you chose, is a socialist thug and has and is taking over businesses in this country. Perhaps you thought it was ok when some CEO “got his.” After all, the one you chose, said he was going to spread the wealth. That had to mean that you were going to get a bigger piece of the pie, right? Like Michelle said, “somebody is going to have to give up their piece of the pie.“ I guess you never dreamed it would be you, eh?

But hey, don’t worry, you wanted to serve this man, right? So look at it this way; look at your job loss as a way of serving him. You are suffering NOW for the sake of your children to have the American dream one day. But by then it will be too late. There won’t be an American dream, it will have turned into a nightmare that you and the others voted in.

As he flits all around the country to take his wife to expensive restaurants and plays (at tax payer expense) you remember that he told you to sacrifice.

You remember the next time he goes into a burger joint pretending to be one of us, while you and your family may not even be able to afford a hamburger in the days to come.

I guess I’m suppose to feel sorry for you, but I don’t. Not at all. YOU voted the pig in, not me. And yes the man is a pig. A pig is one who wants what you have. A pig is one that will tell you to sacrifice while he lives high on the hog.

The only way I would give you my last can of soup is if you came to your senses and realized what a miserable mistake you made by setting this upcoming dictator in power. See, I really don’t owe you a thing. But before it is all over, I’m sure the one you chose will find a way to force me and other true blue Americans to give you a hand out. Why? So he can continue to get your vote and keep you in bondage to him.

But until that day comes where he and his cohorts go door to door stealing from the decent to give to the bums, you get nothing from me. Zilch, nada, nothing.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Russian Newspaper: American decent into Marxism

June 1, 2009 at 1:13 pm (Socialism; Something that Pukes Me, Truth Speakers, Warnings to America) (, , , )

Truth Speaker from Russia wrote the following article. WAKE UP AMERICA!

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/107459-1/

It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people.

True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists.

Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters.

First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their “right” to choke down a McDonalds burger or a BurgerKing burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our “democracy”. Pride blind the foolish.

Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different “branches and denominations” were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the “winning” side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the “winning” side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power. Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America.

The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America’s short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.

These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?

These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees picked from the very financial oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of American dollars, in one bailout after another. They are also usurping the rights, duties and powers of the American congress (parliament). Again, congress has put up little more then a whimper to their masters.

Then came Barack Obama’s command that GM’s (General Motor) president step down from leadership of his company. That is correct, dear reader, in the land of “pure” free markets, the American president now has the power, the self given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will. Come hither, go dither, the centurion commands his minions.

So it should be no surprise, that the American president has followed this up with a “bold” move of declaring that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the entire automotive industry and will even be the guarantee of automobile policies. I am sure that if given the chance, they would happily try and redesign it for the whole of the world, too. Prime Minister Putin, less then two months ago, warned Obama and UK’s Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster. Apparently, even though we suffered 70 years of this Western sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as foolish, drunken Russians, so let our “wise” Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride.

Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper…but a “freeman” whimper.

So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled Congress of America is working on passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the power to set “fair” maximum salaries, evaluate performance and control how private companies give out pay raises and bonuses? Senator Barney Franks, a social pervert basking in his homosexuality (of course, amongst the modern, enlightened American societal norm, as well as that of the general West, homosexuality is not only not a looked down upon life choice, but is often praised as a virtue) and his Marxist enlightenment, has led this effort. He stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but it is retroactive and taken to a logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever received a tax break or incentive.

The Russian owners of American companies and industries should look thoughtfully at this and the option of closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as possible. In other words, divest while there is still value left.

The proud American will go down into his slavery with out a fight, beating his chest and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is. The world will only snicker.

Stanislav Mishin

Permalink 2 Comments

Man has no regrets defending Oklahoma City pharmacy

May 23, 2009 at 4:30 pm (Can Ya Dig It? Justice Sweet Justice) ()

I love justice. I really do. I love it when the good guy rises up and is able to take control over a thug, such as in the story below.

http://newsok.com/feed/man-has-no-regrets-defending-oklahoma-city-pharmacy/article/3371710?custom_click=pod_headline_news

Jerome Ersland was back at work Thursday filling prescriptions and hoping that by taking the life of a 16-year-old boy two days earlier, he had saved others.

Rubbing an oversized bandage on his left forearm, where he said he was grazed by a robber’s bullet, Ersland related details of what he said was a highly organized hit on the Reliable Discount Pharmacy.

“I just regret anybody would get killed,” Ersland said. “But if I wouldn’t have been here, there would have been three people killed — the other pharmacist and the two techs.”

He also recalls the angry voices of people who gathered outside the pharmacy Tuesday night, shouting that he was a racist who unnecessarily took a life of the Seeworth Academy charter school student, Antwun Parker.

“There were a lot of black people gathered out there yelling and everything at my boss,” Ersland said.

After the pharmacy near SW 59 and Pennsylvania was robbed two years ago, the owner installed new security measures to try to make sure his employees would never again be forced to a back room and pistol-whipped.
“We have a very good security system,” Ersland said, motioning to the magnetic door locks that won’t let anyone in or out of the store without permission. “The door locks, and they (robbers) knew that. They had cased it because they knew exactly what time to hit us when we’d have all of our narcotics out and our money out.”

About 10 minutes before 6 p.m., Ersland said, two robbers wearing ski masks waited for someone to leave the pharmacy and then grabbed the open door and threw down a board to stop the door from closing.

The robbers went in cursing and yelling, ordering employees to give them money and drugs, Ersland said.

Two women who were working behind the counter ran for a back room where they would be safe, but Ersland said he couldn’t run. Ersland said he’s a veteran with disabilities from wounds he received in Operation Desert Storm, wears a cumbersome back brace and just had his latest back surgery six weeks ago.

“All of a sudden, they started shooting,” he said. “They were attempting to kill me, but they didn’t know I had a gun. They said, ‘You’re gonna die.’ That’s when one of them shot at me, and that’s when he got my hand.”

Ersland said he was thrown against a wall, but managed to go for the semiautomatic in his pocket.

“And that’s when I started defending myself,” he said. “The first shot got him in the head, and that slowed him down so I could get my other gun.”

But as one robber hit the floor, Ersland said, a bullet from the other robber whizzed past his ear.

The pharmacist said he then got his second gun from a nearby drawer, a Taurus “Judge.”

After he had the big gun, Ersland said, the second robber ran.

But as he started to chase after the second robber, Ersland said, he looked back to see the 16-year-old he had shot in the head getting up again. Ersland said he then emptied the Kel-Tec .380 into the boy’s chest as he kept going after the second robber.

“I went after the other guy, but he was real fast and I’m crippled,” Ersland said.

Outside the pharmacy, he said he saw what he thought was a third black male in a car with the engine running and reaching for what appeared to be a shotgun.

“I pulled out my ‘Judge’ and pointed it right between his eyes and he floored it,” Ersland said.

Because of the sensitive nature of the investigation, police said they could not confirm any of Ersland’s story, including whether Ersland was shot, whether the robbers ever fired on him or even if Parker was armed.
On Thursday, police were still looking for the second robber, described as a black man in his 20s, about 5 feet, 7 inches tall, and weighing about 175 pounds. The man was last seen wearing a red shirt and dark pants.

A man was arrested about a block away after crashing a stolen car that fit the description Ersland gave, but police said the man has not been linked to the robbery.

When he went back in the pharmacy, Ersland said, he called police.
“I asked if the girls were all right, and they were in the back crying,” he said. “I was glad to know they were alive. We were lucky and I’m glad I defended us, because I feel that a person has a right to defend themselves at their home or at their work. People deserve to be safe and not be afraid of people that want to take money when they don’t work for it.”

That’s what the Second Amendment and the state’s “concealed carry” license are for, he said.

“Fortunately, God made them miss me, except for this minor scratch,” Ersland said.

“I was able to return fire and protect the girls’ lives. God was helping me.”

Permalink Leave a Comment

What Does it Say About your Leader when Thugs and Terroists Praise Him?

November 6, 2008 at 12:52 am (Socialism; Something that Pukes Me)

Hamas praises Obama win as ‘historic victory for world’
Terrorists drafting letter of congrats to be sent directly to president-elect

By Aaron Klein
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

 

JERUSALEM – The Hamas terrorist group believes the election of Sen. Barack Obama is an “historic victory” for the world and an opportunity to change U.S. foreign policy toward engagement with America’s foes, Ahmed Yousef, Hamas’ chief political adviser in the Gaza Strip, told WND in an exclusive interview today.

Yousef, speaking by cell phone from Gaza, said Hamas is drafting a letter of congratulation to be sent tomorrow directly to Obama. He said the current draft of the letter praises the president-elect as “another John F. Kennedy, or great Roosevelt.”

“We want to be one of the first to congratulate him,” Yousef said.

“This is an historic day, a turning point. I think this is the very first time in history that one country’s election concerned everyone everywhere all over [the] world,” said Yousef. “Everybody is looking forward to Obama’s change, for a change in the U.S. policy, particularly in the Israeli-Palestinian equation, which is the mother of all conflicts.”

Yousef told WND he believes an Obama administration will be more willing to engage in dialogue with Hamas.

He said Obama’s job will be to “restore America’s dignity in the world and put an end to the wars in the region.”

Yousef took the occasion to blast the policies of President Bush, commenting he hopes “that after January the Bush administration will not be heard from again.”

“We are sick of wars and conflict,” the Hamas official said.

Yousef seemed aware his comments and Hamas’ expected letter to Obama may generate some negative publicity for Obama, but he said he feels it important to “reach out and to express our thoughts and engage.”

“I praised him six months ago, some people tried to use that against him. But I knew he would win. Like everyone else, we expected this important victory,” he said.

Yousef was referring to an interview he gave to WND and WABC Radio in April in which he praised Obama and then found his comments had fueled a firestorm of accusations in the presidential campaign.

In April, Yousef stated he hoped Obama would become president and compared the Illinois senator to President John F. Kennedy.

“We like Mr. Obama, and we hope that he will win the election,” Yousef told WND at the time.

“I hope Mr. Obama and the Democrats will change the political discourse. … I do believe [Obama] is like John Kennedy, a great man with a great principle. And he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community, but not with humiliation and arrogance,” Yousef said.

Sen. John McCain repeatedly used Yousef’s remarks to criticize Obama’s foreign policy.

Obama has condemned Hamas as a terrorist group that should be isolated until it recognizes Israel. He claimed McCain was using the Hamas comments as a “smear.”

Hamas is responsible for scores of suicide bombings, rocket attacks, shootings and cross-border raids. Its official charter calls for the murder of Jews and destruction of Israel. Just today, Hamas members took responsibility for launching dozens of rockets from Gaza aimed at Jewish civilian population centers.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80180

Permalink 2 Comments

Rush Limbaugh: Time to cleanse Republican Party

November 6, 2008 at 1:55 pm (Truth Speakers)

Radio host Rush Limbaugh, the loudest conservative voice in American today blasted John McCain’s presidential campaign as weak and said Barack Obama’s election as president is an opportunity to purge the Republican Party of candidates who abandon conservative principles.

“McCain’s whole campaign was a concession speech,” said Limbaugh in his post-election analysis. “We’ve now demonstrated to everyone how to lose.”

Limbaugh dismissed any notion that victories by Democrats in the White House and Congress meant a repudiation of right-leaning principles.

 

Limbaugh explained conservatism was not on the ballot.

“We haven’t been on the ballot since 1994,” he said, noting that if Republicans wanted to win elections, they should not put so-called “moderates” on the ballot.

“The conservative movement does not need to be rebuilt,” he said. “We had some people abandon the conservative movement, and they need to be abandoned.”

The broadcaster called last night’s results “an opportunity for cleansing … like we haven’t seen in a long time.”

Concerning Obama’s victory speech in Chicago, Limbaugh noted, “He said nothing better than anyone has ever said nothing.”

“We congratulate Obama. We recognize the historical nature. We also understand that more than him being black, he is a radical extremist who is not going to govern from the center. [Nancy] Pelosi and [Harry] Reid are not going to govern from the center. What the hell do people think they wanted to win this election for? When do liberals govern from the center? The only time they do that is when they have to when there are enough Republicans around to keep their extremism in check.

“Screw defeat!” he exclaimed.

Conservative Hippie>>>[RIGHT ON, RUSH!]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80181

Permalink Leave a Comment

Stupid People: Obama Supporter (Updated)

November 7, 2008 at 10:54 pm (Idiot Alerts, Obama Zombies) ()

Do they come any more stupid?

I say she is an idiot because she actually believes if Obama gets in she won’t have to worry about putting gas in her car or have a mortgage!? And to think, these people get to vote! Does she actually think that someone is going to give it to her? Unbelievable! But hey, maybe I’m wrong. Maybe someone will give it to her. If anyone gives her anything it will be the working people of America. For pete sakes, grow up people!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36×8rTb3jI

[Update: Guess I am the stupid one. Looks like she is going to be getting her free gas and her house paid for afterall. Stupid me to think differently a few months ago.]

Permalink Leave a Comment

Rush Tells it Like it is on Republicans Backstabbing Sarah Palin

November 8, 2008 at 9:35 pm (Truth Speakers)

Unconscionable: McCain Staffers Attempting to Destroy Sarah Palin

Transcript of Rush Limbaugh Program:

Ladies and gentlemen, it is worse than I thought.  It is worse than I thought inside the Republican Party.  What the Republican Party, led by disgruntled and failed McCain staffers are trying to do to Sarah Palin, is unconscionable and is unacceptable. 

You remember during the campaign, Bill Cunningham in Cincinnati went out at a rally for McCain, introduced McCain, well, he didn’t introduce him but he got the crowd riled up, he did a warmup for the later appearance by McCain and referred to Obama with his full name, Barack Hussein Obama.  McCain went into a tizzy and denounced Cunningham and he denounced all kinds of other people who were supporting McCain and trying to rally supporters for McCain.  Any time they said anything about Obama that McCain didn’t like, something as innocuous as mentioning his middle name, McCain denounced them, distanced himself.  You wonder why the Republican Party lost in North Carolina.  Remember the great ads the North Carolina Republican Party ran and McCain denounced them, demanded they pull the ads down?

Now, where is Senator McCain today when members of his own staff are trying to destroy Sarah Palin?  I haven’t heard a word.  In fact, all I’ve heard about Senator McCain is this from the Associated Press-Obama:  “During the campaign, McCain staunchly opposed setting a deadline even as the Iraqi government began working with the Bush administration to do so.  But in conceding the presidency to Obama, McCain pledged ‘to do all in my power to help him lead us through the many challenges we face.’  Aides said they believed McCain would work well with Obama as president because much of his best work in the Senate had been done with Democrats, including a landmark campaign finance law he crafted with Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold,” and the unsuccessful effort with Ted Kennedy to pass comprehensive immigration reform.  “Democrats, who padded their majorities in the House and Senate, have a suggestion: McCain can mediate solutions to partisan standoffs on key legislation.” Chuck-U Schumer, New York Democrat:  “There’s a need for the old John McCain, a leader who worked in a bipartisan way.”

So the Democrats, they’re out there, they want McCain to come back and be some kind of a liaison from the Obama White House to the Senate.  The old John McCain’s back, the guy who worked with the Democrats.  Where is he denouncing his own staff dumping all over Sarah Palin?  Let me tell you why they’re dumping all over Sarah Palin.  They are dumping all over Sarah Palin because she is conservative.  This is why I say it is worse than I thought.  I knew during the campaign, I knew during the primaries that we had a bunch of different coalitions now making up the Republican Party and that all those other coalitions were doing everything they could to dismantle and dismember conservatism and to render it inoperative in the Republican Party.  We all knew this.  One of the purposes of the country club blue-blood Republicans was to find a candidate, go out and reach to the other side, bring in Democrats, bring in independents and so forth, and that would be the magic formula to go out and win.  And then support comprehensive immigration reform, because big business wants it for cheap labor and that’s going to get the Hispanic vote.  We see the results.  They were all wrong, the strategies were all wrong, they were a dismal failure.  

So now Sarah Palin, who was the one person in this campaign that brought the Republican base back into the fold, that fired them up, that inspired them, that excited them, we all saw the turnout where she went, we all saw her speeches.  Their focusing here on one Katie Couric interview, but some of the things that they are saying about her are just unconscionable and unacceptable, and they have been leaking this stuff from inside the McCain campaign.  We need to know who these people are for future reference down the line.  Now, Carl Cameron did a report on Fox last night, he was on the O’Reilly factor and he’s now been everywhere on Fox because people have been leaking to him, but it’s not just Fox and Carl Cameron.  Newsweek has a Special Project, they call it, on Sarah Palin, the purpose of which is to destroy Sarah Palin and, of course, establish The Anointed One

It’s worse than I thought. There are country club blue-blood moderate Republicans who want nothing to do with a firebrand conservative in the Republican Party who can fire up people, who can inspire people, who can motivate them.

This Newsweek Special Project is amazing. “Newsweek has also learned that Palin’s shopping spree at high-end department stores was more extensive than previously reported.” Now, why? Why do this? Who benefits from this? Who gains from this kind of story running right now? She’s back in Alaska. The campaign’s over. The election’s over and we got more stories on her wardrobe and how she’s a diva? Who in the world makes out okay if this happens? And, see, when you ask the question of who benefits, it’s amazing how the seas do part and enlightenment shoves your way and you can see exactly what’s going on. Listen to this. “While publicly supporting Palin –” right. Publicly supporting her? We had leaks trying to cream her during the campaign. “– McCain’s top advisers privately fumed at what they regarded as her outrageous profligacy. One senior aide said that Nicolle Wallace had told Palin to buy three suits for the convention and hire a stylist. But instead, the vice presidential nominee began buying for herself and her family — clothes and accessories from top stores such as Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus. According to two knowledgeable sources, a vast majority of the clothes were bought by a wealthy donor, who was shocked when he got the bill. Palin also used low-level staffers to buy some of the clothes on their credit cards.

“The McCain campaign found out last week when the aides sought reimbursement. One aide estimated that she spent ‘tens of thousands’ more than the reported $150,000, and that $20,000 to $40,000 went to buy clothes for her husband. Some articles of clothing have apparently been lost. An angry aide characterized the shopping spree as ‘Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus from coast to coast,’ and said the truth will eventually come out when the Republican Party audits its books. A Palin aide said: ‘Governor Palin was not directing staffers to put anything on their personal credit cards, and anything that staffers put on their credit cards has been reimbursed, like an expense. Nasty and false accusations following a defeat say more about the person who made them than they do about Governor Palin.’”

So what’s going on here is two things: an effort to blame her for the loss, all this talk about she dragged the ticket down, which is an absolute laugher, it is an absolute joke and an effort to damage her for the future. It’s unconscionable what is happening and what they’re doing to Sarah Palin in our own party. Let me ask you this, folks. Will smearing a classy and upbeat conservative star make her more or less popular with the Republican base? If she decides to remain a public figure, she will be a very popular national figure, and I don’t think she’s gonna be intimidated by anybody regarding her decision whatever she wants to do, but that is the precise reason that they’re going after her on our side. McCain moderates don’t care for conservatives. We know this. McCain moderates are not welcome going forward in our party, as far as I’m concerned, especially now that Obama wants McCain to be a liaison between his administration and the Senate, because the good McCain’s back, the old good John McCain, the guy that votes with Democrats, and Chuck-U Schumer, I mean that’s the kind of resume we want, right? We want a resume, we want a guy who claims that the real McCain, Chuck Schumer defining for us who the real McCain is, that’s the guy we want back, right?

It just makes me mad, folks, put plain and simple, it infuriates me. It’s beyond low. Look at what she did. She’s minding her own business up there in Alaska; she didn’t campaign for the veep job. So they call her up, ’cause they need a Hail Mary, they’re admitting when they say they needed a Hail Mary that their own candidate was going nowhere. They need a Hail Mary, so what did she do? She dragged herself and her entire family all over the fruited plain without missing a beat. She was unfailingly cheerful. She was a spot of sunshine in an abysmal election year. And now they’re upset at her because of all the rumors about going rogue and so forth. Wait ’til you hear, if you haven’t heard this yet we’re going to play after the break what Carl Cameron reported he was told on O’Reilly’s Fox show last night by McCain staffers.

Here’s the first of a couple sound bites with Carl Cameron.  This is last night on the O’Reilly Factor:

CAMERON:  Early on, they began to discover that there were these gaps in her knowledge.  I just want to rattle off a couple of the things that insiders say she just simply didn’t know.  There were real problems with basic civics, government structures; municipal state and federal government responsibilities.  She didn’t know the nations involved in the North American Free Trade Agreement, we’re told.  She didn’t understand, McCain aides told me today, that Africa was a continent and not a country, and actually asked them — they argue, they say — if South Africa wasn’t just part of the country as opposed to a country in the continent.  They go on to say that she didn’t understand the idea of American exceptionalism, a classic principle of Wilsonian doctrine that says that the United States is exceptional in the world and has therefore a very special role in leading the globe.

RUSH:  I don’t believe any of this, and what kills it for me is that she “didn’t understand…American exceptionalism.” She’s the only one in the McCain campaign who did understand American exceptionalism, and had to drag the rest of the campaign kicking and screaming into the concept.  We never heard about American exceptionalism from our own party ’til Sarah Palin showed up.  This South African… Not knowing the countries in Africa?  Not knowing how the federal government works? She’s governor of Alaska, for crying out loud!  This is just a smear job.  She is being smeared worse than anybody in the McCain campaign went after Obama or any of his questionable allies.

CAMERON:  There are stories that say she would look at her press clippings in the morning and throw what has been described to me as “tantrums.”  One of the more infamous stories that’s now come out is there was a time when McCain staffers went to collect her at her hotel room and she had just stepped out of the shower and essentially met them wrapped in a bathrobe.  They were taken aback by that.  They have suggested that she’s a bit of a shopoholic and that on more than one occasion she would go out and buy clothes that to many seemed unnecessary because the campaign had already provided her with a very large wardrobe, uh, a wardrobe that famously rang up a bill of $150,000, mostly because they bought extra sizes to make sure everything fit.

RUSH: (laughing) So this is Carl Cameron last night on Fox detailing what had been told to him.  Carl Cameron, by the way, is the voice of the McCain insiders, I should point out.  So they’re dumping on Sarah Palin, and you have to ask yourself: “Why?  Who benefits from this happening to Sarah Palin?”

You might ask, “Why is Carl Cameron spewing all this stuff?” Okay, so somebody inside the McCain campaign reports it to him, but why does he spew all this stuff out there? I guess to have a scoop. I don’t know. But it’s quite telling, it is quite instructive here, ladies and gentlemen, as if we conservatives aren’t angry enough with Obama and McCain, the fact is we’re going to have to defeat ‘em both now, all over again. So I’m just going to warn you, there’s going to be a McCain-somebody, comprehensive immigration bill, which will result in the migration of more nonpaying Democrat voters. This I cannot believe and I’m going to deal with this as the program unfolds before your very eyes and ears today. The wizards of smart on our side are all out there talking about how Obama’s going to govern from the center. (laughing) They have learned nothing! I don’t even think that this is wishful thinking, or hopefulness.

I think it’s pure ignorance that Obama’s going to govern from the center.

Two more sound bites here on Sarah Palin and we’ll move on.  This is from DNCTV this morning, Peter Alexander on Palin’s shopping spree.

ALEXANDER:  An angry McCain aide characterized the shopping spree as “Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus coast to coast.”  In fact, they may have spent as much as 20 to $40,000 for clothes on Todd, 20 to $35,000 on clothes for the children, as one staffer had joked, there were also some Gucci shoes being worn by those kids.  

RUSH:  Now, it’s beyond the pale because this is our own party leaking to the Drive-By Media to destroy Sarah Palin.  This is a clear indication, my friends, of what is happening.  They’re attacking Sarah Palin and they’re the ones that picked her, or McCain did.  They’re destroying Sarah Palin, and you have to ask why, what possible benefit is it right now?  And the only benefit I can see is to make sure she doesn’t rise again as a force for conservatism in the Republican Party.  There’s no other reason to do this.  You can chalk it up to, “Well, maybe they just personally don’t like her,” that’s fine and dandy, but this is suicidal.  And I’ll tell you something else, the people that are doing this, it must really matter, because they are running a huge risk of never getting hired again.  Somebody runs for office, presidential candidate on the Republican side, why would you hire any of these people?  A, they’re the architects of a huge defeat, and B, they’re out now trying to destroy their own vice presidential nominee.  I have an idea of one of the names but I’m not going to mention because I can’t prove it, so I don’t know.  But it’s obviously more than one person and it’s obviously somebody, somebody’s doing this.  Whoever it is has just shown stripes.  This is mind-boggling.  It’s worse than I thought.  Here’s Palin last night, herself, after she had landed back in Alaska.  An unidentified reporter asked her about all these allegations.

PALIN:  That’s kind of a small, evidently bitter type of person who would anonymously charge something foolish like that that I perhaps didn’t know an answer to a question.  So until I know who — who is talking about it, I won’t have a comment on false allegations.

RUSH:  So, that’s Sarah Palin responding to it trying to take the high road and stay above it.  She does raise an interesting point.  Why did this person just go out and blab everything to Carl Cameron at Fox?  Why not just go on camera with Carl Cameron?  Why not just put this out there in your own voice and with your own face on camera?  Go ahead and do it on CNN, go do it on ABC.  Why do this on Fox?  Folks, this is quite telling the way this is all shaking out.  These operatives who are leaking, these are the people who work for moderate Republicans.  They will work for anyone who will pay them.  They are leaking to cover their own butts because they are failures.  They are the architects of the failure of this campaign.  Now, there’s something that happened. I didn’t talk about it because I was trying to stay upbeat and positive.  The last thing I wanted to do was participate here in dispiriting you.  But there was a piece at The Politico.com about two weeks before the election and it was telling, especially now looking at it in hindsight.  It was amazing.  It was a story filled with anonymous leaks, quotes from anonymous people on how horrible the McCain campaign was, how rotten the candidate himself was. 

All of these campaign aides were trying to cover their own rear ends.  They were going out there and blaming other campaign aides for things that went wrong, the choice of Palin, why McCain looked like Yosemite Sam prancing around when the dynamite failed to go off at half the debates.  It was a circular firing squad, and at the time, the way it was interpreted was, okay, the campaign knows they’re going to lose, and these staffers want to work on another campaign, so they’re out there covering their bases, firing anonymous shots at all the other campaign staffers, blaming them and blaming him and blaming her and all that.  And The Politico story put out, okay, this is the first sign this thing is over.  McCain people know they’re going to lose, so the campaign staff now trying to protect themselves.  That’s what this Palin thing is, in part.  This Palin thing, these leakers are the kind of people who work for moderate Republicans.  They’ll work for anybody who will pay them, and they’re leaking to cover their own butts now because they are failures.  That is precisely what is happening here

By the way, folks, notice one thing here.  When these moderate Republicans, when these McCain staffers go after Sarah Palin, they’re not going after her ideas, are they?  They’re not trashing her ideas.  No, no, no, no, no.  They’re not trashing her support for low marginal tax rates, are they?  They’re not trashing her ideas on immigration.  They’re not trashing her ideas on energy, which are better than McCain’s.  They can’t go after her views because going after her views would go after the Republican base, and they still want to pretend that they’re interested in the Republican base. So they’re trashing her personally.  They’re trashing her as a person, ’cause that’s all they have left.  Not even Bob Shrum was this low!  Bob Shrum is a perennial loser on the Democrat side managing Democrat presidential campaigns, and not even he went after the people that worked with him in this way.  

Now, you might also say, “Hey, if they’d have won, it would have been all different.”  I don’t think so.  I do not think so.  This is personal.  I think if they had won, there would still be an effort against Palin right now to get her off the ticket and get somebody else in there as vice president, if they had won. I’ll tell you something else we need to do.  As long as we’re on the subject here, we didn’t even pick our nomineeCan we remember this?  We did not pick the nominee.  The Democrats and the media picked our nominee.  What you people in the McCain campaign and everywhere else need a to start doing in the Republican Party, is close our primaries in states that you have ‘em open where Democrats and independents can cross over and select our nominee.  

The Democrats hated Operation Chaos.  Remember that?  They said, “This is unconstitutional!  Horrible.” It was nothing!  This was one small attempt to duplicate what they’ve been doing for years, selecting our nominee.  So I’ll make a deal: Democrats pick the Democrat nominee; Republicans pick the Republican nominee.  We don’t need Democrats and the media picking both nomineesAnd that is what has happened here.  Now look. I’ve run out of time here to play these sound bites.  That’s what I’m in.  There’s a lot to do on this program.  It’s unfolding very fast, these sound bites about who is Obama.  But these are juicy.  We’ll save ‘em for the monologue section the top of the next hour.  Here’s Bart in Manahawkin, New Jersey.  It’s great to have you, sir, on the Rush Limbaugh program.

CALLER:  Hey, Rush.  How you doing?

RUSH:  Yes, sir.  Fine.

CALLER:  Good, good.  I’ve been listening to you since you had Gorbasms and caller abortions, but I loved it.  Listen, I wanted to bring up a point.  The moderates who are running McCain’s campaign, by saying that Sarah Palin wasn’t a great pick and she has all these problems and so forth, aren’t they basically saying that John McCain made a terrible choice there for vice president; there’s something wrong with his pick?

RUSH:  Well, yeah, you could… (laughing) Haven’t we already established the problem there, long before the pick?  I don’t want to pile on Senator McCain here.  We don’t know that Senator McCain is the one doing the dumping.  All we know is he’s not renouncing his own people who are dumping on her.  You know, why didn’t whoever did this pick some other network? Why did they dump it on Fox? Why’s Fox allowing itself to be used like this?

CALLER:  Oh, sure.  Fox is the one. Fox obviously goes to more conservatives and Republicans than they do to on the other side.  That’s why they picked him.

RUSH:  Look, of course throw in McCain’s judgment on this, but he’s out there. He did defend her.  He defended her quite a bit whenever she came under attack during the campaign.  He hasn’t spoken up since

Conservative Hippie>>>[I have believed for months that we the people, have no clue who is in bed with who concerning the media. That goes for "conservative" media also. I'm beginning to wonder just who can we trust in the media. Rush is on to something.  Thank God for him!]

Permalink 2 Comments

Socialism at Work: When Government Demands Your Service (Part 1)

November 9, 2008 at 1:32 pm (Obama)

CHANGING OF THE GUARD
Web faux pas: Plan leaked for ‘civilian security force’?
Before blogs caught it, Obama site told of requiring students to serve

Excerpts from article gotten here: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80539

(Emphasis are mine)

The official website of President-Elect Barack Obama, Change.gov, originally announced that Obama would “require” all middle school through college students to participate in community service programs; but after a flurry of blogs protested children being drafted into Obama’s proposed youth corps, the website’s wording was softened.

Conservative Hippie>>>[They can soften it all they want. But the truth is still the truth. This tactic is socialism.] 

Originally, under the tab “America Serves” Change.gov read, “President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help teachers in under served schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps.

Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year,” the site announced.

The language of requiring students to serve and the creation of a “Classroom Corps” sparked a surge of criticism from bloggers for bringing back memories of the much-publicized video of marching Obama youth and Obama’s “civilian national security force,” which the candidate said in July would be just as powerful and well-funded as the U.S. military.

Gateway Pundit called Obama’s plan the “creation of his Marxist youth corps,” and DBKP commented, “‘Choosing’ to serve should be approved by parents – not required by the government. No amount of good intentions can sugar-coat words like ‘mandatory,’ ‘compulsory’ or ‘required.’”

Following the furor raised by bloggers, however, the website’s wording was changed.

The word “require” was stricken from the website yesterday, replaced with the phrase “setting a goal” and now also listing tax credits toward college tuition.

The original wording is below:

America Serves
“When you choose to serve — whether it’s your nation, your community or simply your neighborhood — you are connected to that fundamental American ideal that we want life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness not just for ourselves, but for all Americans. That’s why it’s called the American dream.”
-Barack Hussein Obama-
The Obama Administration will call on Americans to serve in order to meet the nation’s challenges. President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help teachers in underserved schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps. Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year. Obama will encourage retiring Americans to serve by improving programs available for individuals over age 55, while at the same time promoting youth programs such as Youth Build and Head Start.

The current website’s content now reads:

America Serves
“When you choose to serve — whether it’s your nation, your community or simply your neighborhood — you are connected to that fundamental American ideal that we want life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness not just for ourselves, but for all Americans. That’s why it’s called the American dream.”
The Obama Administration will call on Americans to serve in order to meet the nation’s challenges. President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help teachers in underserved schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps. Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by setting a goal that all middle school and high school students do 50 hours of community service a year and by developing a plan so that all college students who conduct 100 hours of community service receive a universal and fully refundable tax credit ensuring that the first $4,000 of their college education is completely free. Obama will encourage retiring Americans to serve by improving programs available for individuals over age 55, while at the same time promoting youth programs such as Youth Build and Head Start.

The new wording is consistent with Obama’s campaign website, which also described the college tuition tax credit and detailed “enabling” Americans to serve, rather than “requiring” them to serve.

Elsewhere on the Change.gov site, however, it still describes the plan under the heading, “Require 100 hours of service in college.”

J.D. Tuccille of the Civil Liberties Examiner also points out, “Most public schools depend on federal dollars. As Obama elaborated in a speech last December, ‘At the middle and high school level, we’ll make federal assistance conditional on school districts developing service programs, and give schools resources to offer new service opportunities’

Conservative Hippie>>>[This means teachers will be finding ways of forcing your children to do this in order to get the governement goodies.]

“So, it won’t be the nasty federal government forcing your kids to donate their time to government-approved service, it’ll be the local schools – but that requirement will be among the strings attached to federal money,” Tuccille writes.

Obama’s selection of an advocate for mandatory civil service, Rahm Emanuel, as his chief of staff has further worried bloggers that Obama’s plans may be more “requirement” than “encouragement.”

In his book, “The Plan: Big Ideas for America,” Emanuel writes: “It’s time for a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us. We propose universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, all Americans between the ages of 18 and 25 will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service.”

Conservtive Hippie>>>[Do not let this fool you. It is nothing but indoctrination as your child is off in some socialist boot camp.]

Tuccille comments, “Emanuel and co-author Bruce Reed insist ‘this is not a draft,’ but go on to write of young men and women, ‘the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service.’ They also warn, ‘Some Republicans will squeal about individual freedom,’ ruling out any likelihood that they would let people opt out of universal citizen service.”

Conservative Hippie>>>[It will be more than Republicans who squeal. Have they forgtotten who their constiguents are--the whiners of this nation who think that everybody has owed them? Everybody who loves freedom better rise up and say "NO!"

Obama has also yet to clarify what he meant during his July "Call to Service" speech in Colorado Springs, in which he insisted the U.S. "cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set" and needs a "civilian national security force."

Obama spokesmen have declined to return WND calls requesting an explanation of what this security force would be or whether this force would be "required" or "encouraged."

Conservative Hippie>>>[I think we all can agree it will be "required" and forced.]

Joseph Farah, founder and editor of WND, used his daily column first to raise the issue and then to elevate it with a call to all reporters to start asking questions about it.

“If we’re going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn’t this rather a big deal?” Farah wrote. “I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?

“Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?” Farah wrote.

His call generated intense Internet discussions.

The Blue Collar Muse blog commented, “The questions are legion and the implications of such an organization are staggering! What would it do? According to the title, it’s a civilian force so how would it go about discharging ‘national security’ issues? What are the Constitutional implications for such a group? How is this to be paid. … The statement was made in the context of youth service. Is this an organization for just the youth or are adults going to participate? How does one get away from the specter of other such ‘youth’ organizations from Nazi Germany and the former Soviet Union when talking about it?”

Michael Kinsley also commented generally on plans for enlisting America’s youth in voluntary versus required volunteerism on Time’s website: “Problem number one with grand schemes for universal voluntary public service is that they can’t be both universal and voluntary. If everybody has to do it, then it’s not voluntary, is it? And if it’s truly up to the individual, then it won’t be universal.”

Conservative Hippie>>>[I have so much to say on this that I will have to put it in a Part 2]

Permalink Leave a Comment

Chuck Norris: Obama, now that you work for me …

November 10, 2008 at 1:01 pm (Truth Speakers)

Conservative Hippie>>>[Bold empasis mine.]

Dear President-elect Obama:

First, congratulations on your victory. The historical magnitude of your presidential win is nothing short of stupendous and a colossal fulfillment of the American dream (an achievement embedded long ago in the equality clauses of the Declaration of Independence). Your life has served and will serve as an example to countless millions, and I pray that you will live up to that honorable position and responsibility.

Now that Democrats have a virtual monopoly over our land, with control of the White House, both houses of Congress, a majority of gubernatorial positions, state legislatures, the courts, the news media, the unions and the entertainment and educational fields, it would be relatively easy for you to rule as king, casting liberal edicts in any direction. But now will come your biggest test: Will you be able to lead the other half of the country that doesn’t agree with your vision, views and policies?

It’s no big surprise that I don’t see politically eye-to-eye with you. Actually, I stand in stark opposition to most of your politics. Still, even in our differences, I realize that we must learn to work together if we are to see our country get back on track. After Election Day, I asked myself, despite the outcome, how can I work for our new president to help better America? Then the thought occurred to me, the first question that should be answered is: How will you work for me? After all, it is “We, the People” of the Constitution for whom you are employed, correct?

So I outlined a few ways you might begin to gain the respect of those who oppose you and show that your campaign pledges to bridge the divides were not empty promises to get you into office. And these requests I make are based upon the inaugural oath you will make on Jan. 20, “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” No doubt these won’t be my only suggestions through the years, but they serve as a good beginning:

1. Use and cite the Constitution. If that constitutional oath (“preserve, protect and defend”) is the central duty of your job description, then I would assume we will be hearing often from you about exactly how you are doing just that. There is no replacement for strict adherence, application and defense of the Constitution. And it’s high time that presidents quit tritely reciting the presidential oath only to abandon its tenets when they enter the Oval Office. You should be publicly quoting from the Constitution as often as a preacher quotes the Bible to his congregation – at least weekly. If you take this oath and challenge seriously, you will limit the powers of federal government, reduce taxes (for everyone), encourage the freedom of religion and expression (even in the public square) and stand up for such things as our right to bear arms. The American public and the government has lost its grip on the content and role of the Constitution, and, if you daily choose, you can help to reeducate and model its usage for them.

2. Protect American life. Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1809, “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government.” Those are powerful and enlightening words – “first and only legitimate object of good government.” Of course, such a role was created and secured in the very fabric of our nation – in the Declaration of Independence. The commitment to protect life should serve as a basis to all you do, even as a foundation for your national defense strategy or to protect human life from the womb to the grave. I’m sure the first of your secret briefings this last week on our global security threats have opened your eyes some to the extensive onslaught of our enemies. Don’t allow your pride, partisanship, personal bias or political abilities to ever jeopardize the safety of Americans lives. As commander in chief, you are called to preserve American life. Quite frankly, that is why I’m surprised that a man like you, who professes to fight for minorities, would not recognize the clear value of a human life in the womb. Federal law should not edict the sacrifice of one human life for the preference of another. Both lives should be protected. Otherwise what do Jefferson’s 1809 words mean? As president, you are called to protect (not destroy) human life – it is the “first and only legitimate object of good government.
3. Learn from the mistakes of your Democratic predecessors. I’m referring specifically to presidents Carter and Clinton. Despite how many trumpet their accomplishments today, they learned big lessons at our expense about international diplomacy and economic recovery. Carter’s diplomatic naïveté, combined with his overly altruistic belief that America’s enemies can be won by a smile and handshake, ultimately gave rise to Ahmadinejad’s Iranian regime. Furthermore, Carter’s handling of our economic affairs also led to the highest interest, inflation and unemployment rates in history. You were only a young man, I realize, but I respectfully wonder if you know of those lessons, or might be doomed to repeat them? You can increase the taxes of individuals who make more than $200,000. You can impose the same on companies and corporations. But don’t believe for a minute that they aren’t even now making plans and moving their monies into overseas accounts. Any businessman knows that such tax increases will trickle down to employees, shareholders, consumers or further tempt them to take their productivity abroad where costs are lower. And what will be the effect on our economy? Isn’t it obvious? And don’t forget this: Bush is only partially to blame for our economic woes. Remember, it was the Clinton administration in 1999 that was the primary contributor to our Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae subprime fiasco (and subsequent Wall Street bailout need), by extending billions of mortgage loans to those who wouldn’t or couldn’t ever pay them back. Though gloating over his end-term budget surplus, Clinton paved the path through his government backing of millions of toxic mortgages to low income households – all of which would turn into gargantuan balloon payments years down the road that would bankrupt corporations and lead to our economic recession.

4. Lead more from the center. It’s been pointed out by countless pundits. Your track record is clear. You have one of the most liberal records in the Senate. You’ve had the liberty of voting and fighting for an agenda “from the left,” as you’ve tried to persuade state and congressional constituents to do the same. But if you continue to lead our country down a more liberal road, you will follow the peril of Clinton as well. He stepped into office and initially tried to lift the ban on gays in the military and extend abortion rights, only to prompt the creation of a more-balanced and strong Republican Congress in the 1990s. Don’t underestimate the resurrecting power of the conservative voice. You observed in Tuesday’s election how three states across this union voted to protect marriage in their constitutions (the 28th, 29th and 30th states to do so – California, Arizona and Florida). We will be watching how you lead Pelosi and Reid. We will be observing those you select as candidates for Supreme Court justices. The election is over. No more promises. No more words. You might work well in a team, but this time you don’t have congressional members to hide behind. You’re on your own – leading the pack – and the whole country is watching. Especially me. So make sure you lead more from the center.

There is one thing I will be specifically doing for you, as you carry the weight to lead our nation. I will be praying for you. As the scripture says, “I urge, then, first of all, that requests, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for everyone – for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness.” You have my word – I’ll be praying.

One of your 300 million bosses,

Chuck Norris

Conservative Hippie>>>[Bravo Chuck Norris! Bravo!]

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80577

Permalink Leave a Comment

Wake Up America!Civilization Calls

December 4, 2008 at 1:48 pm (Warnings to America) ()

Please watch the video below. If you believe we are not under any threats from outside forces or enemies from within, you are kidding yourself. Wake up!

http://objllc.com/civilizationcalls.htm

Permalink Leave a Comment

Was Barack Obama a Planned Communist Leader?

April 21, 2009 at 12:46 pm (Obama) ()

I don’t like posting things that I can not verify as truth. Such as the following: 

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/02/11/porter_fife/ 

Yet, in light of the new Socialist abomination in the whitehouse, nothing would surprise me anymore. Decide for yourself it is true or not.  

Wednesday, Feb. 11, 2009 10:15 EST
Breaking news: Barack Obama, Soviet mole

Janet Porter’s latest column for the conservative/conspiracist Web site World Net Daily is just too good not to share. Porter, who was the c0-chair of Mike Huckabee’s Faith and Values Coalition during his run for the presidency, writes:

Brace yourself for what I’m about to say next. Last fall, prior to the presidential election, a friend of mine… sent me an e-mail on which I didn’t report. It just seemed too extreme. It was from a software developer he met named Tom Fife who told of how he first heard of the name “Barack.”

I can’t prove whether it’s true or not, but in light of all that is happening, it just doesn’t seem that far-fetched anymore. All I know is that Tom Fife is a real guy – not some e-mail scam. I’ve talked to him.

Before we get to Fife’s story, something to keep in mind — WND claims to have averaged between 6-8 million visitors per month in the summer and fall of 2002. It’s a fairly big site on the right, and thanks to Porter, those visitors are now reading this from Fife:

During the period of roughly February 1992 to mid-1994, I was making frequent trips to Moscow, Russia, in the process of starting a software development joint-venture company with some people from the Russian scientific community… One evening, during a trip early in 1992, the American half of our venture were invited to V. & T.’s Moscow flat as we were about to return to the States…

As the evening wore on, T. developed a decidedly rough anti-American edge… The bottom line of the tirade she started against the United States went something like this:

“You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect. Well then, why haven’t you had a woman president by now? You had a chance to vote for a woman vice president and you didn’t do it… Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon… What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?

“Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born, and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of presidents. He is what you call ‘Ivy League.’ You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That’s right, a chocolate baby! And he’s going to be your president.”

She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly — as though all were foregone conclusions. “It’s all been thought out. His father is not an American black, so he won’t have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He’s gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America.”

We sat there not knowing what to say… She was full of little details about him that she was eager to relate. I thought that maybe she was trying to show off that this truly was a real person and not just hot air.

She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the Legislature. “Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet…”

Since I had dabbled in languages, I knew a smattering of Arabic. I made a comment: “If I remember correctly, ‘Barack’ comes from the Arabic word for ‘Blessing.’ That seems to be an odd name for an American.” She replied quickly, “Yes. It is ‘African,’” she insisted, “and he will be a blessing for world Communism. We will regain our strength and become the number one power in the world.”

She continued with something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for Communism. America would have to be converted to Communism, and Barack was going to pave the way.

So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove?

Well, it’s definitely anecdotal. It doesn’t prove that Obama has had Soviet Communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is very important. It shows that Soviet Russian Communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed Communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed.

I mean, there is just no way that this story can’t be true, right? She knew where he went to college! And she knew, five years in advance, that he’d be elected to the Illinois legislature! And everyone knows Russians use the words “chocolate baby” all the time. Plus, Fife is really careful with his claims — he acknowledges this doesn’t prove Obama was trained by the Communists, just that it seems very, very likely. Also, there’s just no way anyone would make something like this up, especially not 16 years after the event allegedly occurred.

Sean Hannity, call your office — you have some digging to do.

Permalink 2 Comments

Civil rights: ‘Use ‘em or lose ‘em’

April 22, 2009 at 1:28 am (Socialism; Something that Pukes Me, Warnings to America) (, )

Civil rights: ‘Use ‘em or lose ‘em’
Columnist launches effort challenging gov’s redefinition of ‘terrorist’

WorldNetDaily

WND columnist Janet Porter is warning Americans if they want to keep their civil rights, they’d better be using them right now.

Porter in her newest column took on the issue of the recent “extremist” report from the Department of Homeland Security.

The federal agency’s report is called “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.”

It already has generated a lawsuit by talk radio host Michael Savage and multiple calls for Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to be removed.
According to the federal government, characteristics of members of the suspect group of people include those who:

Oppose restrictions on firearms

Oppose lax immigration

Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship and the expansion of social programs

Oppose continuation of free trade agreements

Oppose same-sex marriage

Has paraonia of foreign regimes

Fear Communist regimes

Oppose one world government

Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world

Is upset with the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India
Porter wrote, “The only way we can keep our freedoms is if we’ll use them – now.”

“One thing’s for sure – we aren’t going to stand by while they profile good, law-abiding citizens as terrorists and take away constitutional freedoms,” she wrote.

“Therefore, we, the law-abiding citizens of America, demand:

“The resignation or removal of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano for her partisan political profiling of veterans and conservatives and her abuse of power.

“An apology from President Barack Obama to ALL Americans for his administration’s call for domestic spying.

“The immediate retraction of the “Rightwing Extremism” report for labeling law-abiding citizens as “terrorists” because of their political views.”

“If you’d like to help sound the alarm before you’re monitored as a potential terrorist, please help. Go to www.f2a.org and click the first blinking alert to fight “hate crimes” and click the link to www.NoPoliticalProfiling.com to help us place a newspaper ad and sign the petition to fight the new definition of “terrorist,” she said.

“DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano has labeled law-abiding citizens as ‘right-wing extremists’ and potential ‘terrorists’ … and has instructed state and local law enforcement to monitor, investigate and ‘report information concerning suspicious or criminal activity to DHS and the FBI,’” she wrote.

Under the DHS plan, she said, among those who would be listed as terrorists would be:

George Washington (military veteran and gun owner)
Mother Teresa (pro-life)
Ronald Reagan (pro-life and staunch advocate for less government), and
The pope (supports life and traditional marriage)

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=95643

Permalink Leave a Comment

Michael Savage – Swine Flu Virus Alert, Useless Government, Precautions

April 26, 2009 at 2:54 pm (Truth Speakers, Warnings to America) (, )

Michael Savage on the swine flu virus coming into the United States through Mexico. Could this be a terroist attack? Why will the government not close the borders? Here’s a thought: they just love to have a crisis– it helps them get things done they never would have been able to do otherwise.

The fact that a “swine” flu is coming to America seems rather appropriate with the swine in the new administration!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZDf1aE0N9I

Permalink 8 Comments

100 DAYS, 100 MISTAKES

April 27, 2009 at 1:11 pm (Obama, We Must Remember This!) ()

Article gotten here

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04252009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/100_days__100_mistakes_166177.htm?page=0 

1. “Obama criticized pork barrel spending in the form of ‘earmarks,’ urging changes in the way that Congress adopts the spending proposals. Then he signed a spending bill that contains nearly 9,000 of them, some that members of his own staff shoved in last year when they were still members of Congress. ‘Let there be no doubt, this piece of legislation must mark an end to the old way of doing business, and the beginning of a new era of responsibility and accountability,’ Obama said.” – McClatchy, 3/11

2. “There is no doubt that we’ve been living beyond our means and we’re going to have to make some adjustments.” — Obama during the campaign.

3. This year’s budget deficit: $1.5 trillion.

4. Asks his Cabinet to cut costs in their departments by $100 million — a whopping .0027%!

5. “The White House says the president is unaware of the tea parties.” — ABC News, 4/15

6. “Mr. Obama is an accomplished orator but is becoming known in America as the ‘teleprompt president’ over his reliance on the machine when he gives a speech.” – Sky News, 3/18

7. In early February, the 2010 census was moved out of the Department of Commerce and into the White House, politicizing how federal aid is distributed and electoral districts are drawn.

8. Obama taps Nancy Killefer for a new administration job, First Chief Performance Officer — to police government spending. But it surfaces that Killefer had performance issues of her own — a tax lien was slapped on her DC home in 2005 for failure to pay unemployment compensation tax on household help. She withdrew.

9. Turkey tried to block the appointment of Anders Fogh Rasmussen as new NATO secretary general because he didn’t properly punish the Danish cartoonist who caricatured Mohammed. France’s Nicolas Sarkozy and Germany’s Angela Merkel were outraged; Obama said he supported Turkey’s induction into the European Union.

10. . . . and he never mentioned the Armenian genocide.

11. The picture of Obama and Hugo Chavez shaking hands.

12. Hugo Chavez gave him the anti-American screed “The Open Veins of Latin America.” Obama didn’t remark upon it. At least it wasn’t DVDs.

13. Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega went on a 50-minute anti-American rant, calling Obama “president of an empire.” Obama didn’t leave the room. “I thought it was 50 minutes long. That’s what I thought,” he said.

14. Executives at AIG get $165 million in bonuses, despite receiving an $173 billion taxpayer bailout.

15. “For months, the Obama administration and members of Congress have known that insurance giant AIG was getting ready to pay huge bonuses while living off government bailouts. It wasn’t until the money was flowing and news was trickling out to the public that official Washington rose up in anger and vowed to yank the money back.” — Associated Press, 3/18

16. “After pushing Congress for weeks to hurry up and pass the massive $787 billion stimulus bill, President Obama promptly took off for a three-day holiday getaway.” — New York Post, 2/15

17. MEGHAN CLYNE ON: “I WON” AND THE DEATH OF BIPARTISANSHIP

“Obama soared to victory on the hopeful promise of a new era of bipartisanship. During his inaugural address he even promised an ‘end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.’

“Too bad it took all of three days for the promise to ring hollow.

“Start with Obama’s big meeting with top congressional leaders on his signature legislation — the stimulus — on the Friday after his inauguration. Listening to Republican concerns about overspending was a nice gesture — until he shut down any hopes of real dialogue by crassly telling Republican leaders: ‘I won.’ Even the White House’s leaking of the comment was a slap at the Republican leadership, who’d expected Obama to adhere to the custom of keeping private meetings with congressional leadership, well, private.

“It’s only gone downhill from there. The stimulus included zero Republican recommendations, and failed to get a single House Republican vote.

“It’s not just the tactic of using Republicans for bipartisan photo-ops, and then cutting them loose before partisan decisions, that irks Obama’s opponents. The new president wasted no time rushing forward with policies and legislation guaranteed to drive Republicans nuts. The first bill he signed into law was the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act — a partisan hot-button that drew all of eight Republican supporters in the entire Congress. Then there was the swift reversal of Bush policies on abortion and embryonic-stem-cell research — issues dear to the Republican base.

“And when Obama and the Democrats in Congress took up SCHIP — the children’s health-insurance bill that Republicans say vastly expands government’s role in health care — they had an easy chance for real bipartisanship. After all, the bill had been hashed out in the previous Congress, and a bipartisan accord was reached before President Bush responded with a veto. Did the Obama team push for the compromise version in the 111th Congress? Nope. They went back to the drawing board, ramming through the Democrats’ dream version.

“Of course, the lack of bipartisanship isn’t limited to Capitol Hill. Obama has taken gratuitous swipes at the Republicans who recently decamped Washington, blaming President Bush for everything from the economy and the war to the lack of sufficient puppies and rainbows. And who could forget the Rush Limbaugh flap — in which Obama’s top advisers, including chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, orchestrated a public relations campaign meant to undermine the Republican National Committee chairman, Michael Steele, by framing talk-radio personality Limbaugh as the real head of the Republican Party.

“For now, Obama’s back-pedal on the bipartisanship promise just makes him look insincere. But the real consequences of the mistake will be felt soon enough. As Presidents Bush and Clinton could tell him, congressional majorities do change — and at some point, Obama will need Republicans on his side. He’d be smart to spend his second 100 days making up for the serious snubs of his first.”

– Meghan Clyne is a DC-based writer.

18. “The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today.” — Department of Homeland Security intelligence report

19. Nixes a “buy American” provision in the stimulus bill.

20. “Yes, Canada is not Mexico, it doesn’t have a drug war going on. Nonetheless, to the extent that terrorists have come into our country or suspected or known terrorists have entered our country across a border, it’s been across the Canadian border. There are real issues there.” — Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. The 9/11 hijackers did not come across the Canada border

21. “The Obama administration is signaling to Congress that the president could support taxing some employee health benefits, as several influential lawmakers and many economists favor, to help pay for overhauling the health care system. The proposal is politically problematic for President Obama, however, since it is similar to one he denounced in the presidential campaign as ‘the largest middle-class tax increase in history.’ ” — New York Times, 3/14

22. JOE SCARBOROUGH ON: PROMOTING FEAR

“During his historic inaugural speech, Barack Obama promised to usher in a transformational age where hope would replace fear, unity would overtake partisanship, and change would sweep aside the status quo. But early in President Obama’s first 100 days it is obvious that the only thing that is changing is the Candidate of Change, himself.

“The same politician who proclaimed during his inauguration that ‘on this day we have chosen hope over fear’ soon warned Americans that the US economy would be forever destroyed if the stimulus bill was voted down.

“Why was it that same man who promised to put Americans’ interests ahead of his own political ambitions chose instead to use the suffering of citizens to advance his agenda?

“Maybe he was following the guidance of Rahm Emanuel, who famously said, ‘You never want to waste a good crisis.’

“They didn’t.

“The White House’s warnings were so over-the-top that Bill Clinton felt compelled to warn the new president against making such grim pronouncements. Americans would quickly warn that the White House would not channel FDR’s eternal optimism but rather embrace the gloomy worldview of Edgar Allen Poe.

“The Candidate of Hope also quickly adopted the Nixonian worldview that Americans voted their fears rather than their hopes. Over Mr. Obama’s first 100 days, that cynical calculation paid off politically for a White House that seemed most interested in appeasing the most liberal members of his Democratic Party.

“I expected more from Barack Obama. For the sake of my country, I hope I get it from the new president over the next 100 days.”

– Joe Scarborough–

23. Sanjay Gupta was in discussions to become Surgeon General, but the TV personality withdrew after he was criticized for his flimsy political record.

24. Rasmussen finds 58% of Americans believe the Obama administration’s release of CIA memos endangers the national security of the United States.

25. Only 28% think the Obama administration should do any further investigating of how the Bush administration treated terrorism suspects.

26. “Obama thanked CIA employees for their work and said they’re invaluable to national security. He explained his decision to release the memos, then told everyone not to feel bad because he was now acknowledging potential mistakes. Theirs, not his. ‘That’s how we learn,’ Obama said, as though soothing a room full of fourth-graders.” — The Oklahoman, 4/23

27. By releasing the torture memos, Obama opened American citizens up to international tribunals. A UN lawyer said the US is obliged to prosecute lawyers who drafted the memos or else violate the Geneva Conventions.

28. In their first meeting, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown gave Obama a carved ornamental penholder from the timbers of the anti-slavery ship HMS Gannet. Obama gave him 25 DVDs that don’t work in Europe.

29. TIM CARNEY ON: PICKING BILL RICHARDSON AS SECRETARY OF COMMERCE

“Richardson’s value in Obama’s Cabinet had everything to do with appearances. First, he was the Hispanic pick. Second, because Richardson had run against Obama for President, tapping him for the Cabinet helped the media write the Obama-Lincoln comparisons by burnishing the ‘Team of Rivals’ image.

“But Richardson withdrew before Obama was even inaugurated when news came out about a criminal investigation involving David Rubin, president of a firm named Chambers, Dunhill, Rubin & Co. (although there was no Chambers or Dunhill), who had donated at least $110,000 to Richardson’s campaign committees and had also profited from $1.5 million in contracts from the state government.

“This was an early warning sign about Obama’s vetting process (various tax problems and the Daschle problem would reveal this as a theme), but picking Richardson to run Commerce also highlighted that Obama and Richardson’s promise of ‘public-private partnerships’ — such as Detroit bailouts, Wall Street bailouts, and green energy–was an open door for corruption and was at odds with Obama’s promise to diminish the influence of lobbyists.

“The Richardson mistake was one of Obama’s first, and it was emblematic. Richardson embodied Obama’s attention to self-image and the problems inherent in his vision of an intimate business-government connection.”

– Tim Carney is a Washington Examiner columnist

30. Timothy Geithner nomination as Secretary of Treasury was almost torpedoed when it was discovered he had failed to pay $34,000 in Social Security and Medicare taxes. He also employed an illegal immigrant as a housekeeper. He was confirmed anyway.

31. . . . Not so lucky, Annette Nazareth, who was nominated for Deputy Treasury Secretary. She withdrew her name for undisclosed “personal reasons” after a monthlong probe into her taxes . . .

32. . . . or Caroline Atkinson, who withdrew as nominee for Undersecretary of International Affairs in Treasury Department, with a source blaming the long vetting process. Geithner still has a skeleton crew at Treasury, with no one qualified — or willing — to take jobs there.

33. “Barack Obama has been embroiled in a cronyism row after reports that he intends to make Louis Susman, one of his biggest fundraisers, the new US ambassador in London. The selection of Mr. Susman, a lawyer and banker from the president’s hometown of Chicago, rather than an experienced diplomat, raises new questions about Mr Obama’s commitment to the special relationship with Britain.” — Telegraph, 2/22

34. Obama’s doom-and-gloom comments and budget bill push the Dow below 7,000, from which it’s only recently recovered.

35. “You’re sitting here. And you’re — you are laughing. You are laughing about some of these problems. Are people going to look at this and say, ‘I mean, he’s sitting there just making jokes about money–’ How do you deal with — I mean: Explain. Are you punch-drunk?” – Steve Kroft, “60 Minutes,” 3/22

36. “We have begun to modernize 75% of all federal building space, which has the potential to reduce long-term energy costs by billions of dollars on behalf of taxpayers. We are providing grants to states to help weatherize hundreds of thousands of homes, which will save the families that benefit about $350 each year. That’s like a $350 tax cut.” — Obama, describing something that doesn’t cut taxes.

37. “The Obama administration has directed defense officials to sign a pledge stating they will not share 2010 budget data with individuals outside the federal government.” — Defense News, 2/19

38. Backtracking on a campaign promise he made to black farmers, Obama significantly lowered the amount of money they could claim in a discrimination settlement against the Agricultural Department. “I can’t figure out for the life of me why the president wouldn’t want to implement a bill that he fought for as a US senator,” said John Boyd, head of the National Black Farmers Association.

39. “I’ve been practicing bowling. I bowled a 129. It was like the Special Olympics or something.” — Obama on “The Tonight Show”

40. Obama lifts travel and remittance restrictions on Cuba.

41. Obama considers dropping the embargo on Cuba.

42. After warming signs from Raul Castro, Fidel Castro says Obama “misinterpreted” his brother’s words, and that Cuba would not be willing to negotiate about human rights.

43. Obama is considering dropping a key demand to Iran, allowing it to keep nuclear facilities open during negotiations.

44. In a letter to Dmitri Medvedev, Obama offered to drop plans for a missile shield in Europe in exchange for Russia’s help in resolving the nuclear weapons issue in Iran.

45. Medvedev said he would not “haggle” on Iran and the missile shield.

46. Obama asked Congress for an extra $83.4 billion to fund operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, a special funding measure of the kind he opposed while in the senate. As a candidate, Obama promised to cut the cost of military operations.

47. After trying to woo Europe as the “anti-Bush,” Obama made an impassioned plea for more troops in Afghanistan. “Europe should not simply expect the United States to shoulder that burden alone,” he said. “This is a joint problem it requires a joint effort.” Only the UK offered substantial help, most others refused.

48. “While the online question portion of the White House town hall was open to any member of the public with an Internet connection, the five fully identified questioners called on randomly by the president in the East Room were anything but a diverse lot. They included: a member of the pro-Obama Service Employees International Union, a member of the Democratic National Committee who campaigned for Obama among Hispanics during the primary; a former Democratic candidate for Virginia state delegate who endorsed Obama last fall in an op-ed in the Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star; and a Virginia businessman who was a donor to Obama’s campaign in 2008.” – Washington Post, 3/27

49. Obama bows to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia at a G-20 meeting in London.

50. “It wasn’t a bow. He grasped his hand with two hands, and he’s taller than King Abdullah.” – An Obama aide

51. DANA PERINO ON: REMAINING IN CAMPAIGN MODE

“Has it really only been 100 days? In many ways it feels like a lot longer.

“That’s partly because the new administration remains in campaign mode most of the time. Now that’s not in itself a bad thing if you can do that and accomplish your agenda. But what’s happened is that a popular new president has laid out a very bold agenda in the midst of an economic crisis, and I don’t think Congress is going to get a lot of work done on those big ticket items this year. They’ll eke out a couple of small wins on issues like healthcare and maybe energy, but the Democrats will hail them as big victories. The Republicans have been working like a cohesive and loyal opposition party, and they need to continue to outline positive new ideas like the recent one to help grow American’s savings.

“The early stumbles on the administration’s high profile nominations — Daschle and Richardson for just to examples — acted like weights around their ankles. In addition, the partisan shots from the White House were unbecoming and I don’t think we’ll see more of that. Our allies and our enemies — heck, even we ourselves — are trying to understand the new foreign policy direction, which in some ways seems to be change just for the sake of change. The next moves by the leaders of other countries — like Iran, North Korea and Venezuela — probably will prove that really not much will change just because America has a new president.

“In many ways, it’s the next 100 days that will tell us more about our new president and what he’ll be able to accomplish than we can forecast based on the first 100 days.”

– Dana Perino was White House press secretary in the Bush Administration

52. “We can’t afford to make perfect the enemy of the absolutely necessary.” — Obama, describing the stimulus bill

53. Three candidates for ambassador to the Vatican — including Caroline Kennedy — were turned down by the Holy See because they supported abortion, according to reports.

54. After saying he wouldn’t have lobbyists in his administration, Obama made 17 exceptions in the first two weeks in office.

55. . . . including Tom Daschle, who worked as a top lobbyist yet was going to be appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services — until his failure to pay income taxes derailed his nomination.

56. For an April 14 speech at Georgetown, the administration asked the university to cover up all signs and symbols — including the letters “IHS” in gold, a symbol for Jesus.

57. Samantha Power, who resigned from the Obama campaign after calling Hillary Rodham Clinton a “monster,” was hired to a position on the National Security Council.

58. “Chicago has yet to recoup the $1.74 million cost of President Obama’s victory celebration in Grant Park — despite a burgeoning $50.5 million budget shortfall that threatens more layoffs and union concessions.” — Chicago Sun-Times, 2/20

59. Firing Rick Wagoner as president of GM.

60. Threatening to fire Vikram Pandit as CEO of Citigroup.

61. Threatening to fire anyone the administration doesn’t like from any company.

62. Not adopting a dog from a shelter.

63. “The GAO study asserts that officials from most of the states surveyed ‘expressed concerns regarding the lack of Recovery Act funding provided for accountability and oversight. Due to fiscal constraints, many states reported significant declines in the number of oversight staff — limiting their ability to ensure proper implementation and management of Recovery Act funds.’ ” – ABC News, 4/23

64. “The National Newspaper Publishers Association named Obama ‘Newsmaker of the Year.’ The president is to receive the award from the federation of black community newspapers in a White House ceremony this afternoon. The Obama White House has closed the press award ceremony to the press.” — Los Angeles Times, 3/20

65. “Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards.” – Attorney General Eric Holder

66. “I didn’t want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances.” – Obama, on consulting with only “living” presidents

67. Obama quietly announced that he would not press for new labor and environmental regulations in the North American Free Trade Agreement, going back on a campaign promise.

68. NICOLE GELINAS ON: MISSPENT STIMULUS

“One of Obama’s most poignant missed opportunities was in not using the historic $787 million stimulus package to reorder state and local government’s spending priorities. As states and cities continue to spend ceaselessly and without results on education and healthcare, they’re crowding out investments in the physical infrastructure that the private sector needs to rebuild the economy.

“In the stimulus, of the more than $200 billion that went directly to states and cities, nearly 70% went to education and healthcare spending. Only 24% went to infrastructure spending.

“But the states and cities in the most trouble already spend way too much on education and healthcare, pushing taxes up and sending private industry away. They don’t spend nearly enough on infrastructure, which attracts the private sector and builds the real economy.

“As David Walker, former comptroller general of the US, said at the Regional Plan Association’s annual meeting a week ago, nationwide, we are the ‘highest in the world’ on education. We are ‘the highest in the world’ on healthcare. ‘Nobody comes even close.’ On infrastructure, by contrast, we are ‘below average’ in both critical new investments and in much-needed maintenance spending.

“And, as Democratic governor of Pennsylvania Ed Rendell said at the same conference, when President Dwight Eisenhower left office, infrastructure spending was about 12.5% of non-military domestic spending. Today, it’s about 2.5%.

“This shortfall is obvious to anyone who’s ridden on an “express train” to the outer boroughs or driven on the Cross Bronx Expressway recently. But in New York, as elsewhere, the stimulus money has just allowed the state to ramp up spending on its wasteful, inhumane Medicaid program and its nosebleed public-school spending.

“Meanwhile, the subways are about to crumble into oblivion — taking the economy with them. The same is true of decaying infrastructure in California and in aging states across the nation.

“The stimulus was a once-in-a-generation chance to change this. Instead, it made the situation worse.”

– Nicole Gelinas is a contributing editor to City Journal

69. “The Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to overrule Michigan v. Jackson, the 1986 Supreme Court decision that held that if police may not interrogate a defendant after the right to counsel has attached, if the defendant has a lawyer or has requested a lawyer. This isn’t the first time the Justice Department, under President Obama, has sought to limit defendants’ rights.” – TalkLeft blog

70. “By any measure, my administration has inherited a fiscal disaster.” — Obama

71. “Ahh, see. I came down here to visit. See this is what happens. I can’t end up visiting with you guys and shaking hands if I’m going to get grilled every time I come down here.” – Brushing off questions from the White House press corps

72. On Earth Day, Obama took two flights on Air Force One and four on Marine One to get to Iowa, burning more than 9,000 gallons of fuel.

73. “President Obama’s plan to require private insurance carriers to reimburse the Department of Veterans Affairs for the treatment of troops injured in service has infuriated veterans groups who say the government is morally obligated to pay for service-related medical care.” – Fox News, 3/17

74. “And I believe the nation that invented the automobile cannot walk away from it.” — Obama during his first State Of The Union address. A German invented the automobile

75. RALPH PETERS ON: FUMBLING IN AFGHANISTAN, FAKING IT IN PAKISTAN

“We’re squandering blood and treasure in Afghanistan. Instead of concentrating fiercely on the vital task of destroying al Qaeda and its friends, the Obama administration’s determined to erect a modern nation where no nation exists. Afghanistan isn’t a country. It’s a dysfunctional reservation inhabited by tribes that hate each other. There’s no ‘Afghan’ identity. And even if our blind-to-reality efforts succeeded perfectly, the result would be meaningless.

“Except as a target range where we can gun down terrorists, Afghanistan doesn’t matter. Next door, Pakistan matters immensely. But we don’t know what to do about it. With 170 million anti-American Muslims descending into chaos as Pashtuns, Baluchis, Punjabis, Sindhis and others claw each other over the country’s shabby remains, Pakistan’s corrupt president shrugs, its military cowers, its loathsome intelligence services collude with Islamist extremists, and the safety of its nuclear weapons grows doubtful.

“Pakistan may be this generation’s chamber of horrors.

“The Obama administration’s response? Drill more wells in the Afghan countryside. Dramatically reinforce our troops in Afghanistan, sticking them with an impossible mission of modernizing a pre-medieval landscape while exposing them at the end of an insecure 1,500-mile supply line through, of all places, Pakistan.

“As for Pakistan itself, the Obama administration wants to send billions of dollars to a thieving government that makes Nigeria’s look like a Quaker meeting and to hand Pakistan’s military more arms — weapons that might soon be used against us.

“Pakistan was a bad idea when it was created in 1947. It’s a worse one now. Afghanistan wasn’t even an idea, just an accident of where other borders ended. We can’t ’save’ either one — because neither wants to be saved on our terms.

“Obama said the right things — that Afghanistan isn’t Iraq and that our goal should be the destruction of al Qaeda. But his policies just regurgitate our Iraq strategy (one he opposed) in a profoundly different context, while ambitious generals echo Vietnam-era calls for more forces.

“Our troops will do whatever we ask, to the best of their magnificent abilities. But we should ask them to do things that make sense. We need creative strategic thought, but we’re succumbing to sheer inertia. And the president’s supporters who howled that we should abandon Iraq to concentrate on their candidate’s ‘good war’ don’t seem to be volunteering to do any fighting. Meanwhile, our president’s trapped himself inside his own campaign promiseing, Vietnam!”

– Ralph Peters is the author of “Looking for Trouble: Adventures in a BeW”

77. “President Obama failed to consult Congress, as promised, before carving out exceptions to the omnibus spending bill he signed into law — breaking his own signing-statement rules two days after issuing them — and raised questions among lawmakers and committees who say the president’s objections are unclear at best and a power grab at worst.” — Washington Times, 3/24

78. Adolfo Carrion was confirmed as Director of White House Office of Urban Affairs, but is serving under a cloud after allegations that he accepted thousands of dollars in cash from developers whose projects he approved.

79. KYLE SMITH ON: GOING AFTER RUSH LIMBAUGH

“Every so often an unfocused athlete forgets about the field of play and climbs into the stands. Ty Cobb did it. Ron Artest did it. Maybe no one did it with more sick flir than the greasy, furious Hanson Brothers who, in ‘Slap Shot,’ climbed into the stands to give a beatdown to a fan.

“In March, Barack Obama sent his own personal Hanson Brothers, Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and spokesman Robert Gibbs, out to attack a non-politician — Rush Limbaugh — who was sitting innocently in the stands jeering the action. Limbaugh didn’t even throw a cup of beer.

“Senior White House staffers, who have already fallen into the classic trap of paying more attention to polls than fixing the country’s problems, had become obsessed with surveys showing that Limbaugh was an unpopular figure with swing voters. Pretty soon Emanuel and Gibbs developed Limbaugh Tourette’s. To paraphrase Joe Biden’s witty putdown of Rudy Giuliani, for a few days every sentence they uttered contained three things: a subject, a verb and Rush Limbaugh.

“El Rushbo, chuckling over his cigar as his ratings skyrocketed, could not have been more pleased if a picture had emerged of Obama wearing a Che Guevara T-shirt and burning the American flag on Harvard Square. Even that portion of the public that doesn’t like Rush squirmed at the embarrassing spectacle of the president’s men going all Mean Girls on an entertainer. George W. Bush’s spokesmen maintained a dignified silence about Michael Moore. Picture them fanning out over the Sunday talk shows to denounce, and drive up the box-office receipts of, ‘Fahrenheit 9/11.’ Wouldn’t you have loved that, Michael?”

– Kyle Smith is a Post columnist

80. Forced banks that didn’t want TARP money to take it, then added on stipulations about pay and government control after the fact. Secretly forced Bank of America to buy Merrill Lynch, then allowed the bank to be criticized for overpaying.

81. “More than 90% of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States,” Obama said in Mexico, yet factcheck.org says, “The figure represents only the percentage of crime guns that have been submitted by Mexican officials and traced by U.S. officials. We can find no hard data on the total number of guns actually ‘recovered in Mexico,’ but US and Mexican officials both say that Mexico recovers more guns that it submits for tracing. Therefore, the percentage of guns ‘recovered’ and traced to US sources necessarily is less than 90%.”

82. Obama: “[Jim Owens, the CEO of Caterpillar, Inc.], said that if Congress passes our plan, this company will be able to rehire some of the folks who were just laid off.” Jim Owens: “I think realistically no. The truth is we’re going to have more layoffs before we start hiring again.”

83. “In America, there is a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.” — Obama in Strasbourg, France

84. Joe Biden: “If we do everything right, if we do it with absolute certainty, if we stand up there and we really make the tough decisions, there’s still a 30% chance we’re going to get it wrong.”

85. Joe Biden: “You all worked for change. You wanted to see change. Well, that wasn’t a hard thing to try to communicate to the American people. Obviously, obviously, we needed a change almost no matter who was running.”

86. Joe Biden: “You know, I’m embarrassed. Do you know the Web site number? I should have it in front of me and I don’t. I’m actually embarrassed.”

87. “There are more than 6.5 million trucks in the United States. The program Congress terminated allowed 97 Mexican trucks to roam among them. Ninety-seven! Shutting them out not only undermines NAFTA. It caused Mexico to retaliate with tariffs on 90 goods affecting $2.4 billion in U.S. trade coming out of 40 states.” – Charles Krauthammer, 3/20

88. DAVID M. DRUCKER ON: BOWING TO CONGRESS

“Although the president possesses enormous political capital — both because of high approval ratings and because his administration is still in its infancy — he has generally declined to exercise it with Democratic leaders in the House and Senate, including when it comes to crafting legislation key to moving his agenda forward.

“Rather he has allowed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev) to craft legislation as they see fit — even though the very bills in question were proposed by the president and involve key planks in his agenda. Among them were Obama’s signature $787 billion economic stimulus bill, his first major piece of legislation that was signed into law in February; and now health care reform, currently being negotiated on Capitol Hill with minimal input from the White House.

“This soft-pedal style of leadership runs the risk of forcing Obama to embrace legislation constructed for narrow partisan interests rather than in a manner capable of garnering broad bipartisan support. Over time, the public might come to see Obama’s deference to Pelosi and Reid as a weakness of leadership not befitting a president in tough times.”

– David M. Drucker is a staff writer for Roll Call

89. “It has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census, there are irresolvable conflicts for me.” – Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), who became the second failed Commerce Secretary nominee

90. In the third sentence of his first speech as president, Obama said, “44 Americans have now taken the presidential oath.” The correct number is 43, as Grover Cleveland served twice.

91. The $49 million inauguration — triple what taxpayers spent at Bush’s first inauguration.

92. Giving the Queen of England an iPod full of his own speeches.

93. Three prime-time briefings in his first 100 days, eating into television revenues and this Wednesday pre-empting “American Idol.”

94. “The United States government has no interest in running GM. Your [GM] warranty will be safe. In fact, it will be safer than it’s ever been, because starting today, the United States government will stand behind your warranty.” — Obama

95. GM is given $15.4 billion in loans from the government.

96. The Obama Administration is trying to scuttle a lawsuit filed in federal court against Iran by former US embassy hostages. The lawsuit alleges that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was one of the hostage-takers who interrogated the captives.

97. GLENN BECK ON: BAD ECONOMIC PREDICTIONS

“Ten days before his inauguration, the President’s chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, Christina Rohmer, released a report describing what to expect economically during the first 100 days and beyond. It presented two starkly different scenarios: one good (if the stimulus were to be passed), and one terrifyingly bad (if we did nothing). Amazingly, the report estimated that if the stimulus package were to pass, the unemployment rate would not go above 8% at any time until at least 2014.

“It’s already at 8.5%.

“In fact, while there is an acknowledged level of uncertainty, the projections estimated that the unemployment rate would be lower today if we had done nothing at all. This suggests one of two things: either the administration misjudged the seriousness of our economic problems, or the stimulus plan is actually making things worse. I suspect it’s a little of both.

“Remember, when the President’s budget was released, he was roundly criticized for his never ending deficits, even under his own optimistic scenarios for growth. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected deficits that were even uglier. But, if the President and his economic planners were this far off, this soon, how much worse does the future look now?

“The election was supposed to bring ‘change,’ but I was hoping for more than the letter after the President’s name, the positivity of the media coverage, and the hypoallergenic qualities of the White House puppy. President Obama didn’t get us into this situation, but so far he’s doubling down on the same spending philosophy that did. Common sense tells us that new debt is not the cure for old debt. No matter what the slogans say, that won’t change in 100 days or 100 years.”

– Glenn Beck is the host of the “Glenn Beck” show, weekdays at 5 p.m. on Fox News.

98. “Education Secretary Arne Duncan has decided not to admit any new students to the D.C. voucher program, which allows low-income children to attend private schools … For all the talk about putting children first, it’s clear that the special interests that have long opposed vouchers are getting their way.” – Washington Post, 4/11

99. Obama enrolled his daughters in a DC private school.

100. “Don’t think we’re not keeping score, brother.” – Obama to Rep. Peter DeFazio, after the Democratic congressman voted against the stimulus bill.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Mentally Disabled Running the White House!

April 28, 2009 at 9:36 pm (Obama) (, )

If I had the slightest inclination (which I never have) that the adminsitration now in Washington was just even a tiny bit able to run this country; I wouldn’t anymore. I am convinced they have got to be the biggest bunch of inept inadequate morons EVER to run this nation.

Yesterdays stupid idiotic display of Air Force One flying over the city with a fighter jet behind it was enough to make any decent American good and ticked off. I know I was.

I looked upon my fellow Americans (both Reublican and Democrat) running in the streets of New York anticipating another terror attack. I’m sure I was not the only one feeling the same emotions of 911. There was nothing funny about it. There is nothing casual about it and it should not be treated as such.

There is no excuse for it, Washington! What the BLEEP is WRONG with you?! Where is your head?! Get it out of your BLANK! What is it with you people? Are you really so stupid or where there was some other ulterior motive behind this stunt other than a photo op?

Just what is so important and special about your stupid photos anyway that you would risk scaring a whole city to death? You sicken me! 

And WHY was it told to keep silent? The mayor didn’t even know about it for crying out loud! I’m convinced you people care NOTHING about common every day people going about their daily lives. If you did, you NEVER would have allowed this to happen. Especially in New York!

Haven’t those people been though enough?! It was horrible enough on the dreadful day of 911, let alone this GOVERNMENT creating another like-minded event out of your own stupidity or some kind of sick game you are playing.

Suppossingly, Obama didn’t know. Yeah, right. Suppossingly the WHITE HOUSE didn’t know anything about it. Suppossedly Obama is “furious.” Uh huh, yeah right. I believe that like I believe in the tooth fairy. It’s YOUR cabinet, Obama. YOU chose these people. Birds of a feather flock together, eh? One moron leads them all.

Don’t take all the people for idiots.

I am so angered this happened. But maybe just maybe it will wake some people up as to who and what is running this country! New york, even if some of you did help put this man in office, you do not deserve this kind of treatment. I am just sorry that they cared so little about you to think no more of you than do this to you.

Be safe New York, be safe!

Wake up America!

Permalink 4 Comments

This is where socialized health care will lead us!

April 30, 2009 at 1:14 pm (Warnings to America) ()

Swine flu: A 39-year-old woman spent the last eight days of her life going from clinic to clinic to find out what was wrong. She has been the first to die.

Imagine having to go clinic to clinic just to find out what is wrong with you! THEN not having anyone able to diagnose your condition. Imagine being so ill you just wanted someone to take you serious enough to at least put you in the hospital. But no, socialized healthcare had the patient running all around the country–infecting others at the same time–wearing the poor woman out and making her more sick.

WHAT kind of treatment is this?! I guarantee it that if she had been a politician, she would have gotten taken care of real quick.

America wake up!

THIS is what we can expect if Obama gets his healthcare system.  

In the meantime: CLOSE THE DAMN BORDERS, you moron! That is unless you are wanting to use this whole thing as a way to “get something done that you never could have gotten done in any other way.”

Article of 39 year old woman found here: http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE53S92V20090429

Permalink Leave a Comment

Texas Doctor Claims Swine Flu Cases Far Worse Than Reported

May 1, 2009 at 1:26 am (Swine Flu) ()

I do not like sensationalism. I don’t want to be part of it. Yet, if there is any truth in the following article, I would sound an alarm to my readers. I can not verify it. I offer it to you just in case there is any truth in it. Take it and do what you will with it.

Texas Doctor Claims Swine Flu Cases Far Worse Than Reported, Level 6 Pandemic In Effect.
Up to 25 times more victims than official figure, hospitals overwhelmed, virus already at level 6 pandemic phase.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, April 30, 2009

A doctor in Texas claims that swine flu cases are at least ten times worse than officials are letting on, and that hospitals are becoming overwhelmed as the virus has already crossed the threshold to be considered a phase 6 global pandemic.

Dr. Marcus Gitterle, an emergency medicine physician based out of New Braunfels, Texas, sent out an internal alert which contains several stunning claims about swine flu that, if true, officials have presumably sought to keep from the public.

“After I returned from a public health meeting yesterday with community leaders and school officials in Comal County and Hays County, (name removed) suggested I send an update to my patients in the area, because what we are hearing privately from the CDC and Health Department is different from what you are hearing in the media,” writes Gitterle.

The doctor claims that the actual number of confirmed cases of swine flu is 10 to 25 times worse than has been reported, and that people are not recovering easily, as has been claimed, but that many Americans are in fact seriously ill.

“The way they fudge on reporting this is that it takes 3 days to get the confirmatory nod from the CDC on a given viral culture, but based on epidemiological grounds, we know that there are more than 10 cases for each “confirmed” case right now,” claims Gitterle.

“This has not been in the media, but a 23 month old in Houston is fighting for his life, and a pregnant woman just south of San Antonio is fighting for her life,” he writes.

Gitterle’s mention of a “23 month old in Houston” obviously refers to the Mexican toddler who died on Monday night and was announced as the first U.S. fatality on Tuesday morning.

Quick access to drugs like Tamiflu and Relenza, as well as ventilators, is preventing fatalities on the scale of Mexico, but Gitterle warns that “within a couple of weeks, regional hospitals will likely become overwhelmed”.

Gitterle warns, “ER’s south of here are becoming overwhelmed — and I mean that — already. It is coming in waves, but the waves are getting bigger.”

The doctor states that the severity of the situation has already crossed the threshold of the definition of a WHO phase 6 pandemic. “This has not happened in any of our lifetimes so far. We are in uncharted territory,” he writes.

Gitterle claims that President Obama is being advised to declare a national emergency and that this could happen within the next 48 hours.

“This may not happen, but if it doesn’t, I will be surprised. When this happens, all public gathering will be cancelled for 10 days minimum,” writes the doctor.

Gitterle advises people to avoid all public gatherings, especially those held indoors, to avoid going to their ER if they feel ill, and to take the nutritional supplements N-Acetyl-Cysteine and Oscillococinum.

Conservative Hippie>>>[He advises to avoid going to their ER if they feel ill? To take nutritional supplements? What is wrong with this picture?] 

He recommends Relenza as a more powerful drug than Tamiflu but warns that supplies of both drugs are running out fast.

Conservative Hippie>>>[That's fine IF you can get the drugs. something tells me not every body will get it if needed. There will be rationing and only those they choose will get it. The Obama administration has already said (weeks ago) that the elderly, under his healthcare will NOT receive a lot of healthcare. Why? Becaue they have lived their life. Healthcare will be manily for the young.]

The doctor states that swine flu is infectious for about two days prior to symptom onset and that the virus can spread for more than seven days after symptom onset. The symptoms are the same as normal flu, although it has been discovered that swine flu causes a distinctive “hoarseness” in many victims.

“Since it is such a novel (new) virus, there is no “herd immunity,” so the “attack rate” is very high. This is the percentage of people who come down with a virus if exposed. Almost everyone who is exposed to this virus will become infected, though not all will be symptomatic. That is much higher than seasonal flu, which averages 10-15%. The “clinical attack rate” estimation from CDC and WHO may be around 40-50%. This is the number of people who show symptoms. This is a huge number. It is hard to convey the seriousness of this to those outside of the medical fields,” he writes. 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/texas-doctor-claims-swine-flu-cases-far-worse-than-reported.html

Permalink 2 Comments

Ann Coulter: Watching MSNBC is torture

May 8, 2009 at 10:53 am (Truth Speakers) ()

The media wail about “torture,” but are noticeably short on facts.

Liberals try to disguise the utter wussification of our interrogation techniques by constantly prattling on about “the banality of evil.”

Um, no. In this case, it’s actually the banality of the banal.

Start with the fact that the average Gitmo detainee has gained 20 pounds in captivity. There’s even a medical term for it now: “the Gitmo gut.” Some prisoners have been heard whispering, “If you think Allah is great, you should try these dinner rolls.”

In terms of “torture,” there was “the attention grasp,” which you have seen in every department store you have ever been where a mother was trying to get her misbehaving child’s attention. If “the attention grasp” doesn’t work, the interrogators issue a stern warning: “Don’t make me pull this car over.”

Further up the parade of horribles was “walling,” which I will not describe except to say Eliot Spitzer paid extra for it.

And for the most hardened terrorists, CIA interrogators had “the caterpillar.” Evidently, the terrorists have gotten so fat on the food at Guantanamo, now they can’t even outrun a caterpillar.

Contrary to MSNBC hosts who are afraid of bugs, water and their own shadows, waterboarding was most definitely not a “war crime” for which the Japanese were prosecuted after World War II – no matter how many times Mrs. Jonathan Turley, professor of cooking at George Washington University, says so.

All MSNBC hosts and guests were apparently reading “Little Women” rather than military books as children and therefore can be easily fooled about Japanese war crimes. (MSNBC: The Official Drama Queen Network of the 2012 Olympics.)

Given what the Japanese did to prisoners, waterboarding would be a reward for good behavior.

It might be: Waterboarding PLUS amputating the prisoner’s healthy arm, or waterboarding PLUS killing the prisoner. But waterboarding on the order of what we did at Guantanamo would be a reward in a Japanese POW camp.

To claim that the Japanese – architects of the Bataan Death March – were prosecuted for “waterboarding” would be like saying Ted Bundy was executed for engaging in sexual harassment.

What the Japanese did to their POWs made even the Nazis blanch. The Japanese routinely beheaded and bayoneted prisoners; forced prisoners to dig their own graves and then buried them alive; amputated prisoners’ healthy arms and legs, one by one, for sport; force-fed prisoners dry rice and then filled their stomachs with water until their bowels exploded; and injected them with chemical weapons in order to observe, time and record their death throes before dumping them in mass graves.

While only 4 percent of British and American troops captured by German or Italian forces died in captivity, 27 percent of British and American POWs captured by the Japanese died in captivity. Japanese war crimes were so atrocious that even rape was treated as only a secondary war crime in the Tokyo trial, similar to what happens during an R. Kelly trial.

The Japanese “water cure” was to “waterboarding” as practiced at Guantanamo what rape at knifepoint is to calling your secretary “honey.”

The Japanese version of “waterboarding” was to fill the prisoner’s stomach with water until his stomach was distended – and then pound on his stomach, causing the prisoner to vomit.

Or they would jam a stick into the prisoner’s nose so he could breathe only through his mouth and then pour water in his mouth so he would choke to death.

Or they would “waterboard” the prisoner with saltwater, which would kill him.

Meanwhile, the alleged “torture” under the Bush administration consists of things like:

  • “failing to respect a Serbian national holiday”; or
  • “forgetting to wear plastic gloves while handling a Quran.”

Finding out who started the tall tale about “waterboarding” being treated as a war crime after World War II would take the talents of a forensic historian, someone like Christina Hoff Sommers.

After years of hearing the feminist “fact” that emergency room admissions for women beaten by their husbands soared by 40 percent on Super Bowl Sundays, Sommers traced it back to an unsubstantiated rumination erupting from a feminist rap session.

But the lunatic claim was passed around with increasing credibility until it ended up being cited as hard fact in the New York Times, the Boston Globe and on “Good Morning America.”

One of the earliest entries in the “waterboarding as war crimes” myth must be this October 2006 article in the Washington Post, citing a case raised by Sen. Teddy Kennedy – and heaven knows Kennedy understands the horrors of a near-drowning:

“Twenty-one years earlier, in 1947, the United States charged a Japanese officer, Yukio Asano, with war crimes for carrying out another form of waterboarding on a U.S. civilian. The subject was strapped on a stretcher that was tilted so that his feet were in the air and head near the floor, and small amounts of water were poured over his face, leaving him gasping for air until he agreed to talk.”

Even if that description of what Asano did were true – and it isn’t – the only relevant word in the entire paragraph is “civilian.”

Any mistreatment of a civilian is a war crime. So every other part of that paragraph is utterly irrelevant to the treatment of prisoners of war, much less non-uniformed enemy combatants at Guantanamo, who could have been shot on sight under the laws of war.

What Americans need to understand is that under liberals’ own “laws of war,” they will invent apocryphal incidents from history in order to give aid and comfort to America’s enemies and to undermine those who kept us safe for the past eight years.

Permalink Leave a Comment

‘Hate crimes’ fate now up to people

May 9, 2009 at 12:00 pm (Obama's Dream; Our Nightmare, Revolution of Resistance) (, )

Article gotten here: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=97503

A Texas member of Congress is warning Americans that unless they act – and act now – the nation soon will have a “hate crimes” law that actually was written so that it protects pedophiles and others with alternative sexual orientations such as voyeurism and exhibitionism.

“If you guys don’t raise enough stink there’s not chance of stopping it,” U.S. Rep. Louis Gohmert said today on a radio program with WND columnist Janet Porter. She’s the chief of the Faith2Action Christian ministry and has coordinated a campaign to allow citizens to send overnight letters to members of the U.S. Senate expressing opposition to the plan.

Already well over 2,000 people have utilized the procedures and more than 200,000 letters have been dispatched to members of the Senate.

“It’s entirely in the hands of your listeners and people across the country,” Gohmert told Porter. “If you guys put up a strong enough fight, that will give backbone enough to the 41 or 42 in the Senate to say we don’t want to have our names on that.”

An analysis by Shawn D. Akers, policy analyst with Liberty Counsel, said the proposal, formally known as H.R. 1913, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act bill in the House and S. 909 in the Senate, would create new federal penalties against those whose “victims” were chosen based on an “actual or perceived… sexual orientation, gender identity.”

He warned Porter during the interview that even her introduction of him, and references to the different sexual orientations, could be restricted if the plan becomes law.

“You can’t talk like that once this becomes law,” he said.

He said the foundational problem with the bill is that it is based on lies: it assumes there’s an epidemic of crimes in the United States – especially actions that cross state lines – that is targeting those alternative sexual lifestyles.

“When you base a law on lies, you’re going to have a bad law,” he said. “This ‘Pedophilia Protection Act,’ a ‘hate crimes’ bill, is based on the representation that there’s a epidemic of crimes based on bias and prejudice. It turns out there are fewer crimes now than there were 10 years ago.”

He said he fought in committee and in the House, where it was approved 249-175, to correct some of the failings, including his repeated requests for definitions in the bill for terms such as “sexual orientation.”

Majority Democrats refused, he said. He said that leaves the definition up to a standard definition in the medical field, which includes hundreds of “philias” and “isms” and would be protected.

Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., a “hate crimes” supporter, confirmed that worry, saying:

This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these ‘philias’ and fetishes and ‘ism’s’ that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule…”

President Obama, supported strongly during his campaign by homosexual advocates, appears ready to respond to their desires.

RedeemedHippie>>>[But of course Obama is ready; what can you expect from a man that calls evil good and good evil?]

“I urge members on both sides of the aisle to act on this important civil rights issue by passing this legislation to protect all of our citizens from violent acts of intolerance,” he said.

But Gohmert pointed out that if an exhibitionist flashes a woman, and she responds by slapping him with her purse, he has probably committed a misdemeanor while she has committed a federal felony hate crime.

“That’s how ludicrous this situation is,” Gohmert said.

According to published reports, the Senate Judiciary committee may be holding a hearing on the bill on Tuesday.

For only $10.95, any member of the public can send letters to all 100 senators, individually addressed and “signed” by the sender. The letters ask for a written response and call for opposition to the bill, including by filibuster if necessary.

RedeemedHippie>>>[For only $10.95? Somebody is making money off this. I would suggest we find another way to make them listen to us. I'm not giving them a cent. Write them seperately we have to.]

According to a staunch critic on “hate crimes” provisions, Rev. Ted Pike, “This is a ‘hearing’ to which no witnesses will probably be called. No troublesome Republican debate or amendments may be allowed.”

RedeemedHippie>>>[Obama is a liar. He said he would be a great unifier. He is a liar. This new administration is evil.]

Akers’ analysis said the bill would result in the federalization of “virtually every sexual crime in the United States.” And he said it appears to be part of an agenda that would relegate pro-family and traditional marriage advocates into the ranks of “terrorists.” Critics also hvae expressed alarm because in committee hearings Democrats admitted that a Christian pastor could be prosecuted under the law if he spoke biblically against homosexuality, someone heard the comments and then committed a crime.

“Under [the plan] the speech of a criminal defendant and the mere membership of the defendant in a given group may be used as evidence of his or her biased motive,” Akers said.

He said there’s already an effort afoot in the U.S. to list those pro-family organizations “alongside several neo-Nazi groups … to create guilt by the artificial manufactured appearance of association.”

The letter to senators being promoted by Porter, in part, says:

“I am writing to urge you to do all in your power to oppose passage of S.909, also known as ‘The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act.’

“Passage of this bill by the U.S. Senate would be reckless and irresponsible not only because of the ‘chilling effect’ it would have on First Amendment-guaranteed rights to free speech, but also because it would provide, for the first time ever, special legal protections for pedophiles and other sexual offenders.

“If there was ever a time for the Senate to stand and fight with a filibuster, that time is now. We are calling for members of the Senate, Republicans and Democrats alike, to stop S. 909.
“While the bill’s supporters have very effectively framed the bill as one that will protect victims from criminal acts, the bill actually has very little to do with protection,” Akers wrote.

“The bill does not merely provide stiffer penalties for certain crimes but, rather, represents a substantive and fundamental shift away from the American ideas of free speech and God-given immutable equality and toward the European ideas of state approved speech, state endorsed morality, state-given egality,” he said.

Foremost, the bill simply ignores the 14th Amendment requirements that all citizens be protected equally, providing special protections for homosexuals and others with alternative sexual lifestyle choices, he said.

Matt Barber, also of Liberty Counsel, wrote in a commentary, “Not only is this legislation constitutionally dubious on First Amendment grounds, and a prima facie violation of Fourteenth Amendment required ‘equal protection of the laws;’ it also flies in the face of the Tenth Amendment, which explicitly limits the federal government’s authority in such matters to those powers delegated by the U.S. Constitution.”

“To illustrate the point, one need look only to the most famous supposed ‘hate crimes’ victim of all, Matthew Shepard, who, as it later turned out, was killed during a robbery for drug money gone awry,” he wrote. “This fact notwithstanding, the left continues to disgracefully politicize Shepard’s memory by claiming he was murdered simply for being ‘gay.’ … The bizarre irony is palpable. The two thugs who killed Shepard are currently serving life sentences for their crimes – and rightfully so – in the complete absence of any discriminatory and unnecessary ‘hate crimes’ legislation,” he said.

During arguments in the House while the plan was being adopted, lawmakers pointed out the representatives were voting for protection for “all 547 forms of sexual deviancy or ‘paraphilias’ listed by the American Psychiatric Association.”

Porter cited the amendment offering from Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, in committee that was very simple:

The term sexual orientation as used in this act or any amendments to this act does not include pedophilia.
But majority Democrats refused to accept it.

“Having reviewed cases as an appellate judge, I know that when the legislature has the chance to include a definition and refuses, then what we look at is the plain meaning of those words,” explained Gohmert. “The plain meaning of sexual orientation is anything to which someone is orientated. That could include exhibitionism, it could include necrophilia (sexual arousal/activity with a corpse) … it could include Urophilia (sexual arousal associated with urine), voyeurism. You see someone spying on you changing clothes and you hit them, they’ve committed a misdemeanor, you’ve committed a federal felony under this bill. It is so wrong.”

RedeemedHippie>>>[Lord come quickly!]

Send your letter of opposition now to all 100 senators by overnight delivery.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Ellis Washington; Obama Inc.

May 9, 2009 at 12:16 pm (Obama's Dream; Our Nightmare, Revolution of Resistance, Truth Speakers, Warnings to America) (, , , )

Article gotten here

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=97500

Obama, the transcendent, messianic, FDResque figure is more akin to Goldstein, the minister of propaganda [in George Orwell's, "1984"] who with the help of his fascist legions spent day and night following one credo: Your liberty, your money, your property, your soul all belong to the State (federal government).
~ From “Thou shall not lie”

What do you call a man, a leader, a president of the greatest country in the history of the world that daily ignores constitutional strictures like separation of powers, which limits executive power? What do you call a pathological narcissist that daily creates vast, new totalitarian powers for himself by executive decree while the slavish Democrats, the irrelevant Republicans and the servile liberal media bow to his every will? How would you characterize Wall Street, private corporations, education, medicine, housing and energy who collectively tremble in fear if they don’t obey his latest unconstitutional commands, that they will be the next recipient of his vengeful wrath?

The recent headlines on DrudgeReport.com told the grim tale of Big Brother 2009, aka Obama Inc.:

“Number of unemployed getting benefits climbs to record 8.9%”
“Obama vows to retrain”
BIG BUDGET BLOWOUT: $3,400,000,000,000.00 SPENDS $11,300 FOR EACH AMERICAN”
“Massachusetts welfare recipients provided cars at taxpayers expense”
“GM post $6 billion loss for first quarter”
“National bailout agency for U.S. cities”
“Computer sold on eBay ‘had details of top secret missile defense system’”
“Chinese and U.S. ships clash – for fifth time”

To a rational person who loves America and respects the traditions of the Founding Fathers, anti-federalism and executive restraint, the headlines are gut-wrenching, but to a proud fascist like President B. Hussein Obama, those dire headlines above read like the soothing, euphonious strains of a Wagnerian opera. And like Wagner’s primo uomo, “Siegfried,” a man who literally went to hell and back to learn how to fear, only more socialism, anarchy and nihilism can set the proper pretext for this Grand Finale. Only in Chaos Theory can the stage be adequately prepared for Obama Inc. to appear stage left to save America. Yet there is no salvation, no redemption – only a hellish, eternal nightmare that he himself created!

What is Obama Inc. (incorporated)? Like the title suggests, it is our president’s systematic, comprehensive plan to takeover and dominate every conceivable aspect of our lives from the cradle to the grave. But more diabolically, Obama Inc. seeks to have omnipotent, irrevocable dictatorial power over every American citizen. I call this aspect of Obama Inc. the Democrat Eternity Act (DEA).

Obama is utterly a revolutionary figure following a long, ignoble tradition of former great tyrants like Nebuchadnezzar, Caesar, Muhammad, Henry VIII, Napoleon, Mussolini, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, LBJ, Putin, Chavez and others. Obama Inc. thinks in grand, over-arching, totalizing themes rather than simply single programs as Clinton did with gays in the military or national health care in 1993. No, no, no – one program, even one-seventh of America’s entire multi-trillion dollar economy, is much too small for Obama Inc. to be bothered with.

In an earlier article I wrote last year titled, “How Thomas Hobbes is helping destroy America,” I predicted that through the natural development of ideas over time, society, culture, law, politics, economics, philosophy and all disciplines of knowledge would soon be exploited by a future demagogue that would transform America into a dictatorship.

I wrote:

After War World II, the Supreme Court’s liberal view of a “living Constitution” and “evolving standards of decency” led to radical judicial activist opinions in the areas of racial segregation, civil rights, separation of church and state and the so-called “right to privacy” – in cases like Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) – leading to an entire cottage industry of new rights like the Court’s abortion finding in Roe v. Wade (1973) and 30 years later to the constitutional right to homosexual sodomy in Lawrence v. Texas (2003).
You can thank Thomas Hobbes for elevating our racialist, humanist, childish, sexual and vulgar desires to the legitimate level of constitutional rights.

According to a recent Supreme Court opinion in California, homosexual marriage has once again been raised to the standard of a constitutional “right” by this overtly activist court over the explicit will of the people. It will be interesting where this and numerous other hot button issues takes society as courts grapple with “rights” vs. “privileges,” “property rights” vs. “liberty interests,” etc. Has this “due process explosion” of the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s, as federal judge Henry Friendly opined, fundamentally altered the ability of government to manage schools, bureaucracy, agencies, culture, society … ourselves? I think it has.

One hundred ten days after taken the oath as president of the United States, who would have thought that Obama Inc., led by this unremarkable pol, this intellectually vacuous fascist from Harvard, could have achieved so much, so soon, yet here we are in the midst of a burgeoning totalitarian State equal in every respect but the year of George Orwell’s “1984″ – nevertheless we appear too stupid to realize where we are.

Ignorance (I don’t know) and apathy (I don’t care) are the twin narcotic drugs Obama Inc. has used to lobotomize America over the past 100 days, but his Machiavellian tactics go further back 100 years to Woodrow Wilson, who, according to Jonah Goldberg’s excellent book, “Liberal Fascism,” was America’s first fascist president. Interestingly, Wilson’s fascism (1913) predated Lenin’s Bolshevik Revolution (1917) by four years and Mussolini’s fascism (1922) by nine years.

Finally, precursors of Obama Inc. could be heard 330 years ago in the writings of the great English political philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) who prophesied a tyrannical political figure like Obama in his magnum opus, “Leviathan” (1651) and summarized his entire oeuvre in one telling, succinct last utterance from his deathbed – A great leap into the dark.

Unless this narcissist, Manchurian Candidate is stopped, America will soon be plunged into a new Dark Age called Obama Inc.

Permalink 2 Comments

ALL ANY REPUBLICAN (CONSERVATIVE) NEEDS TO SAY

May 11, 2009 at 11:46 am (Right On!) ()

God belongs in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Taxes are the most oppressive device conceived by men to control other men.

Money in the hands of liberal politicians is like heroin in an addict’s needle.

Life begins at conception.

Bill and Hillary Clinton are among history’s most corrupt people.

Barack Obama is the first Communist president.

The traditions for which Republicans historically stand are the glue that binds Americans together.

The United States of America is the greatest country in the history of the world.

Our borders should be closed until further notice.

Diversity is wrong, unity is right.

Education is all-important, but not all education is important.

Teachers need to teach their subjects instead of their politics.

For a government to take in more money than it needs is criminal.

For a government to spend more money than it has is destructive.

For a government to keep a surplus instead of returning it to taxpayers is grounds for dissolving that government.

Judges should judge, not legislate.

No judge should have a lifelong term.

All judges should be periodically judged.

Whites don’t owe blacks reparations since the debt was paid in full with blood.

Imposition of a reprehensible lifestyle on children in the name of tolerance is an abomination.

The media is by and large liberal, it lies and distorts regularly, and is the primary cause for the murder of America’s soul.

Believing in Jesus Christ is a good thing. Mentioning His name every so often in prayer is even better.

Building a better life for our children is the parent’s responsibility, not the government’s.

Americans who constantly condemn America are not Americans.

Life is what you make it, not what the government makes for you.

Do not be fooled by the rhetoric and cowardice of the left.

Peace, love and Woodstock are to be grown out of, not into.

War is hell, but slavery is worse.

There is no gray on the palette of right and wrong.

List gotten here

http://www.theconservativegentleman.com/?page_id=680

Permalink Leave a Comment

Letter to Obama

May 11, 2009 at 12:02 pm (Let it be Known!, Obama, Revolution of Resistance) (, )

I did not write the following, but I wish I had. It conveys thoughts that many of us have. Might not be a bad idea to mail it to him? Bold emphasis mine.

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

 Mr. Obama:

I have had it with you and your administration, sir.  Your conduct on your recent trip overseas has convinced me that you are not an adequate representative of the United States of America collectively or of me personally.

 You are so obsessed with appeasing the Europeans and the Muslim world that you have abdicated the responsibilities of the President of the United States of America.  You are responsible to the citizens of the United States.  You are not responsible to the peoples of any other country on earth.

 I personally resent that you go around the world apologizing for the United States telling Europeans that we are arrogant and do not care about their status in the world.  Sir, what do you think the First World War and the Second World War were all about if not the consideration of the peoples of Europe?  Are you brain dead?  What do you think the Marshall Plan was all about?  Do you not understand or know the history of the 20th century?

Where do you get off telling a Muslim country that the United States does not consider itself a Christian country?  Have you not read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States?  This country was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics and the principles governing this country, at least until you came along, come directly from this heritage.  Do you not understand this?

Your bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia is an affront to all Americans.  Our President does not bow down to anyone, let alone the king of Saudi Arabia. You don’t show Great Britain, our best and one of our oldest allies, the respect they deserve yet you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia.  How dare you, sir!  How dare you!

You can’t find the time to visit the graves of our greatest generation because you don’t want to offend the Germans but make time to visit a mosque in Turkey.  You offended our dead and every veteran when you give the Germans more respect than the people who saved the German people from themselves.  What’s the matter with you?

I am convinced that you and the members of your administration have the historical and intellectual depth of a mud puddle and should be ashamed of yourselves, all of you.

You are so self-righteously offended by the big bankers and the American automobile manufacturers yet do nothing about the real thieves in this situation, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frank, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelic, the Fannie Mae bonuses, and the Freddie Mac bonuses.  What do you intend to do about them?  Anything?  I seriously doubt it. 

What about the U.S. House members passing out $9.1 million in bonuses to their staff members – on top of the $2.5 million in automatic pay raises that lawmakers gave themselves?  I understand the average House aide got a 17% bonus.  I took a 5% cut in my pay to save jobs with my employer.  You haven’t said anything about that.  Who authorized that?  I surely didn’t!

Executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be receiving $210 million in bonuses over an eighteen-month period, that’s $45 million more than the AIG bonuses.  In fact, Fannie and Freddie executives have already been awarded $51 million – not a bad take. Who authorized that and why haven’t you expressed your outrage at this group who are largely responsible for the economic mess we have right now.

I resent that you take me and my fellow citizens as brain-dead and not caring about what you idiots do.  We are watching what you are doing and we are getting increasingly fed up with all of you.  I also want you to know that I personally find just about everything you do and say to be offensive to every one of my sensibilities.  I promise you that I will work tirelessly to see that you do not get a chance to spend two terms destroying my beautiful country. 

Sincerely,

 Every real American

Permalink Leave a Comment

Obama loves terroists and is no friend to Israel

June 10, 2009 at 9:44 pm (Israel, Obama) (, )

I posted an earlier post titled, “Is Barack Obama telling Israel to kiss his foot?”

Now we have this: Terrorists: Obama ‘humiliating’ Israel

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100725

Some Islamic terrorists here are viewing an image of President Obama showing the sole of his shoes while on the telephone with Israel’s prime minister as a message of humiliation aimed at Israel.

“This is worse than a slap in the face. It’s a sign of humiliation that shows Obama thinks the Israeli government and the Jews don’t deserve more than shoes,” Abu Mujaheed, the spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees terrorist organization told WND.

“This proves Obama is disgusted with the Israelis. He understands how U.S. support to Israel brought all this hatred toward the U.S. in the world. With Obama’s shoes, change will come,” he said.

Abu Ahmed, a leader of Hamas’ so-called military wing in the Gaza Strip, commented, “Just as a journalist humiliated (President) Bush with his shoes, this is how Obama is humiliating the Israeli government.”

The terrorists were sounding off about an image snapped in the White House on Tuesday of Obama talking with Prime Minister Bejnamin Netanyahu while the U.S. president had the soles of his shoes up on his desk and in full view of the camera.

While flashing shoe soles is not usually viewed as an insult in Judaism, the gesture is among the most insulting in Islam. The image of Obama is being compared to an Iraqi journalist who infamously lobbed his shoes at Bush last year in Iraq.

The image also is stirring some controversy in the Israeli media.

Aluf Benn, a commentator for the Israeli Haaretz newspaper weighed in: “As an enthusiast of Muslim culture, Obama surely knows there is no greater insult in the Middle East than pointing the soles of one’s shoes at another person. Indeed, photos of other presidential phone calls depict Obama leaning on his desk, with his feet on the floor.”

Several Israeli newscasters last night broadcast the image of Obama on the phone with Netanyahu and branded it an insult to the country.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Obama: Any world order that elevates one nation over another will fail

June 4, 2009 at 11:28 pm (Obama, Socialism; Something that Pukes Me) (, )

“ Any world order that elevates one nation over another will fail.”

-Barrack Hussein Obama-

Uh, is it the same for any government that elevates itself over the people?

Some nations ARE better than other nations. There is nothing wrong in admitting that. Some are led by wicked deceitful men, therefore, it is never wrong to point that out.

Some nations still live in the stone age and they want to force the rest of the world to live like them.

And then there is America, a nation that pretends to be a godly nation and thus has elected a deceitful socialist who pretends to be Christian. Therefore, by electing such an individual, by desiring government to be your god, it makes us one of the worst nations on the earth.

His majesty Obama’s comments are nothing more than pushing towards the New World Order which will have the wicked in power.  He is helping to usher in the anti-christ; whoever it is.

Lord come quickly!

Permalink Leave a Comment

Obama makes everyone sacrifice but himself

June 4, 2009 at 2:57 pm (Obama, Socialism; Something that Pukes Me, Truth Speakers) (, , )

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100005

By Benjamin Shapiro

Let us compare two historical situations. One took place several thousand years ago. The other took place on Monday.

According to legend, during the 13th century B.C., there was a Greek king named Agamemnon. He was bound and determined to attack and raze the city of Troy. When Agamemnon sought to launch his ships for Troy, however, the goddess Artemis sent a stagnant wind to stop Agamemnon’s fleet. Agamemnon responded by calling out his daughter, Iphigenia, and sacrificing her to appease Artemis.

Fast forward to last Monday. In announcing the bankruptcy of General Motors, President Barack Obama spoke directly to all those who would lose their jobs and their livelihoods.

“I want you to know that what you’re doing is making a sacrifice for the next generation – a sacrifice you may not have chose to make, but a sacrifice you were nevertheless called to make so that your children and all of our children can grow up in an America that still makes things; that still builds cars; that still strives for a better future,” he said.

Obama is fond of calling upon Americans to make sacrifices – or rather, he is fond of forcing Americans into sacrificing themselves at a time and place of his choosing. Heroic sacrifice requires volunteerism, or at least an element of extraordinary choice; Obama’s sort of sacrifice runs along Agamemnon-esque lines. He names the time and the place, and you are expected to put your neck on the altar.

Obama’s sacrificial ideology is particularly egregious because it targets minority groups who can do nothing to defend themselves. Obama targets the taxpaying minority, forcing them to pay for bank bailouts and auto gratuities while falsely promising that taxpayers will earn that money back (when do we get our checks?). He targets GM bondholders, the same folks whose retirement money has been keeping the ailing carmaker afloat; his new bankruptcy plan makes their holdings worthless. He demonizes Chrysler’s investors as “speculators” and attempts to portray them as villains in Chrysler’s demise. He forces banks to take TARP money, then defenestrates bank chiefs and caps executive pay.

It would be one thing if Obama expected all Americans to sacrifice equally. Clearly, however, he does not. He, for one, isn’t willing to sacrifice – he’s ready to spend $24,000 of taxpayer money to take his wife on a date to New York. And Obama doesn’t expect his allies to sacrifice, either. The United Auto Workers, whom Obama has praised for its “sacrifice,” now owns a majority of Chrysler and a huge chunk of GM; not coincidentally, UAW gave millions to Obama’s campaign. Obama refused to bail out California unless it revoked pay cuts for members of the Service Employees International Union; not coincidentally, SEIU gave $33 million to Obama’s campaign.

Obama’s self-centered idea of sacrifice – sacrifice yourself on Obama’s behalf, or he’ll sacrifice you – doesn’t stop at the water’s edge. America’s foreign allies are feeling similar pressure to sacrifice themselves for Obamemnon’s glory. Thus, Obama presses Israel to stop building new houses in Jewish Jerusalem while encouraging Palestinian Arabs to build illegal settlements within Jerusalem. Thus, Obama tacitly allows Iran to develop nuclear weapons and reaches out to the illegitimate mullahs while stifling any freedom movement within Iran. Thus, Obama allows China to violate human rights while offering them the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval for their supposed work on global warming – all in order to entice China to keep buying our debt. Sacrifice, it seems, is only to be made by those who least deserve to make it.

There is one crucial difference between Agamemnon and Obama: Agamemnon led his troops to victory at Troy. Iphigenia was merely an innocent bystander used to accomplish his purposes. Obama, by contrast, is bound to lead America to ruin precisely because of the sacrifices he is forcing upon the most productive Americans and our most important allies.

Obama’s philosophy makes the sacrifice of individual liberty irrelevant to the broader communal good as he defines it. What we are losing on the Altar of Obamemnon is far more than a few bucks – it is the fundamental basis of free government.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Truth Speaker: Ann Coulter on Tiller the Baby Killer

June 3, 2009 at 11:47 pm (Abortion, Mad Scientists, Truth Speakers) (, )

I just love this woman! Shes’ got more nerve than any Republican in congress. Keep tell it like it is Ann!

In the wake of the shooting of late-term abortionist George Tiller, President Barack Obama sent out a welcome message that this nation would not tolerate attacks on pro-lifers or any other Americans because of their religion or beliefs.

Ha ha! Just kidding. That was the lead sentence – with minor edits – of a New York Times editorial warning about theoretical hate crimes against Muslims published eight months after 9/11. Can pro-lifers get a hate crimes bill passed and oceans of ink devoted to assuring Americans that “most pro-lifers are peaceful”?

For years, we’ve had to hear about the grave threat that Americans might overreact to a terrorist attack committed by 19 Muslims shouting “Allahu akbar” as they flew commercial jets into American skyscrapers. That would be the equivalent of 19 pro-lifers shouting “Abortion kills a beating heart!” as they gunned down thousands of innocent citizens in Wichita, Kan.

Why aren’t liberals rushing to assure us this time that “most pro-lifers are peaceful”? Unlike Muslims, pro-lifers actually are peaceful.

According to recent polling, a majority of Americans oppose abortion – which is consistent with liberals’ hysterical refusal to allow us to vote on the subject. In a country with approximately 150 million pro-lifers, five abortionists have been killed since Roe v. Wade.

In that same 36 years, more than 49 million babies have been killed by abortionists. Let’s recap that halftime score, sports fans: 49 million to five.

Meanwhile, fewer than 2 million Muslims live in America and, while Muslims are less murderous than abortionists, I’m fairly certain they’ve killed more than five people in the United States in the last 36 years. For some reason, the number “3,000″ keeps popping into my head.

So in a country that is more than 50 percent pro-life – and 80 percent opposed to the late-term abortions of the sort performed by Tiller – only five abortionists have been killed. And in a country that is less than 0.5 percent Muslim, several dozen Muslims have killed thousands of Americans.

But the killing of about one abortionist per decade leads liberals to condemn the entire pro-life movement as “domestic terrorists.” At least liberals have finally found some terrorists they’d like to send to Guantanamo.

Tiller bragged about performing 60,000 abortions, including abortions of viable babies, able to survive outside the mother’s womb. He made millions of dollars performing late-term abortions so gruesome that only two other abortionists – not a squeamish bunch – in the entire country would perform them.

Kansas law allows late-term abortions only to save the mother’s life or to prevent “irreversible physical damage” to the mother. But Tiller was more than happy to kill viable babies, provided the mothers: 1) forked over $5,000; and 2) mentioned “substantial and irreversible conditions,” which, in Tiller’s view, apparently included not being able to go to concerts or rodeos or being “temporarily depressed” on account of their pregnancies.

In return for blood money from Tiller’s profitable abattoir, Democrats ran a political protection racket for the late-term abortionist.

In 1997, the Washington Post reported that Tiller attended one of Bill Clinton’s White House coffees for major campaign contributors. In addition to a $25,000 donation to Clinton, Tiller wanted to thank him personally for 30 months of U.S. Marshals’ protection paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.

Kansas Democrats who received hundreds of thousands of campaign dollars from Tiller repeatedly intervened to block any interference with Tiller’s abortion mill.

Kathleen Sebelius, who was the governor of Kansas until Obama made her health and human services secretary, received hundreds of thousands of campaign dollars from Tiller. Sebelius vetoed one bill restricting late-term abortions and another one that would have required Tiller to turn over his records pertaining to “substantial and irreversible conditions” justifying his late-term abortions.

Kansas Attorney General Paul Morrison also got elected with the help of Tiller’s blood money, replacing a Republican attorney general who was in the middle of an investigation of Tiller for various crimes including his failure to report statutory rapes, despite performing abortions on pregnant girls as young as 11.

But soon after Morrison replaced the Republican attorney general, the charges against Tiller were reduced and, in short order, he was acquitted of a few misdemeanors. In what is a not uncommon cost of doing business with Democrats, Morrison is now gone, having been forced to resign when his mistress charged him with sexual harassment and corruption.

Tiller was protected not only by a praetorian guard of elected Democrats, but also by the protective coloration of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America – coincidentally, the same church belonged to by Tiller’s fellow Wichita executioner, the BTK killer.

The official Web page of the ELCA instructs: “A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born.” As long as we’re deciding who does and doesn’t have an “absolute right to be born,” who’s to say late-term abortionists have an “absolute right” to live?

I wouldn’t kill an abortionist myself, but I wouldn’t want to impose my moral values on others. No one is for shooting abortionists. But how will criminalizing men making difficult, often tragic, decisions be an effective means of achieving the goal of reducing the shootings of abortionists?

Following the moral precepts of liberals, I believe the correct position is: If you don’t believe in shooting abortionists, then don’t shoot one.

http://www.wnd.com:80/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100053

Permalink Leave a Comment

Next page »